To read this content please select one of the options below:

Design for safety implementation factors: a literature review

Anush Poghosyan (The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Patrick Manu (The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)
Lamine Mahdjoubi (Department of Architecture and the Built Environment, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK)
Alistair G. F. Gibb (School of Architecture, Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK)
Michael Behm (East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA)
Abdul-Majeed Mahamadu (Department of Architecture and the Built Environment, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK)

Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology

ISSN: 1726-0531

Article publication date: 11 October 2018

Issue publication date: 30 October 2018

800

Abstract

Purpose

Decisions made during the design stage of construction works can significantly reduce the risk of occurrence of occupational accidents, injuries and illnesses. Moreover, it has been established that design is one of the major contributors of accidents and injuries. Design for safety (DfS) studies within construction have highlighted factors affecting the implementation of DfS, among which are designer attitude; DfS knowledge/awareness and education; availability of DfS tools, including guidance; client’s influence and motivation; and legislation. The purpose of this study is to carry out an in-depth literature review of DfS studies within construction to explore the extent to which existing DfS research has looked at the above-listed DfS implementation factors.

Design/methodology/approach

A review of 164 journal articles related to DfS in construction (published from 1990 to 2017) within built environment, engineering and multidisciplinary safety journals was undertaken.

Findings

The findings indicate that around 60 per cent of the journal articles reviewed address designer knowledge/awareness and education issues, about 27 per cent looked at DfS implementation tools to assist designers to undertake DfS, about 23 per cent studied client influence/motivation, about 16 per cent studied designers’ attitudes towards DfS implementation and approximately 16 per cent looked at the role of legislation in DfS implementation. The literature points that client influence/motivation and legislation are very influential DfS implementation factors despite a limited number of studies in these areas.

Originality/value

Overall, the findings provide an indication of areas of DfS implementation, particularly client influence/motivation and legislation, where more research would be needed to promote DfS in construction to help mitigate the occurrence of accidents and injuries.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This work has been funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (grant number: EP/N033213/1) as part of research into DfS in the construction sector. Appreciation is extended to the following industry partners for their in-kind contribution towards the research work: Bam Construction Limited, Heathrow Airport, ISG, Mott MacDonald, Nick Bell Risk Consultancy, GCP Architects and Safety in Design.

Citation

Poghosyan, A., Manu, P., Mahdjoubi, L., Gibb, A.G.F., Behm, M. and Mahamadu, A.-M. (2018), "Design for safety implementation factors: a literature review", Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 783-797. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-09-2017-0088

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles