To read this content please select one of the options below:

Brokering school improvement through a school–university partnership: a longitudinal social network analysis of middle leadership development

Darren A. Bryant (School of Education, Curtin University, Perth, Australia)
Chun Sing Maxwell Ho (Department of Education Policy and Leadership, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)
Jiafang Lu (Department of Education Policy and Leadership, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)
Yiu Lun Leo Wong (Department of Education Policy and Leadership, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 20 September 2024

Issue publication date: 29 November 2024

70

Abstract

Purpose

This study addresses a gap in the knowledge on how longitudinal engagement in a school improvement initiative influences change in middle leaders’ (MLs') interactions and assesses how school–university partnerships around school improvement can support teachers with formal leadership roles (i.e. MLs’) leadership development.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a two-year longitudinal research design, university staff facilitated middle leadership training in a school-defined improvement initiative on lesson study. Results from a pre-test followed by two post-tests administered at one-year intervals were collected on social networks. Analyses examined changes in indegree and brokerage patterns among groupings of senior leaders (SL), subject leaders, cross-school specialists and teachers.

Findings

Accounting for staffing changes, 27 of 67 staff members participated in each survey, yielding 1,623 distinct ties connecting school members. Over the first year, advice-seeking increased by 225%. SLs’ initial propensity to consult peers shifted towards MLs and teachers. Subject leaders advising other leaders and teachers increased tenfold. Teachers’ peer-to-peer consultation increased by 2,000%. Specialists with school-wide responsibilities became the dominant group for advising other leaders, such as SLs and subject leaders. These shifts were sustained over the second year.

Originality/value

The study demonstrates that engagement in the school–university partnership support and the corresponding structural changes stimulated robust cross-school dialogue among teachers and various leaders. Brokerage patterns indicated an enhanced role for MLs in driving the school-defined improvement initiative which corresponded to university-designed development activities.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This research is partly supported by a GRF project funded by Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (Project No. 18610719).

Citation

Bryant, D.A., Ho, C.S.M., Lu, J. and Wong, Y.L.L. (2024), "Brokering school improvement through a school–university partnership: a longitudinal social network analysis of middle leadership development", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 62 No. 6, pp. 668-685. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2023-0244

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles