To read this content please select one of the options below:

Relationships, instruction, understandings: one district’s implementation of rounds

Rachel Roegman (Department of Educational Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA)
Thomas Hatch (Department of Curriculum and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA)
Kathryn Hill (Department of Sociology and Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA)
Victoria S. Kniewel (Edgemont Public Schools, Edgemont, NY, USA)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 3 August 2015

412

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to show how instructional rounds contributes to shared understandings and facilitates the development of relationships among administrators.

Design/methodology/approach

This mixed methods study draws on three years of data in a district engaged in rounds. Administrators annually completed a social network survey, which focussed on how often they interacted around instructional issues. Additionally, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of administrators.

Findings

Administrators have increased their participation in and understanding of instructional rounds, as well as their understanding of district initiatives. However, results are mixed when looking at the quantitative data. While the theory of rounds suggests that the process would lead to increased interactions, the authors found a statistically significant decrease.

Research limitations/implications

Implications include examining rounds as part of a district’s set of formal and informal structures. Also, results suggest further examination of how turnover impacts networks. Finally, expanding the number of interviews may present a more mixed qualitative experience of rounds.

Practical implications

As districts adopt initiatives based on observations, rounds can be used to support administrators’ growth in understanding these initiatives. Simultaneously, districts need to consider the purpose for both central office and building administrators and how those purposes align with protocols, norms, and practices they use.

Originality/value

This paper advances the empirical knowledge on instructional rounds, which has been gaining popularity, though little empirical analysis exists of the process, how its theory of action is enacted, and how administrators experience rounds.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the administrators in Birchwood Regional Public Schools who participated in the surveys and interviews over the course of this study. The authors would also like to thank colleagues at the Panasonic Foundation and a group of superintendents with whom the authors work for the participation in discussions that contributed to the development of this work.

Citation

Roegman, R., Hatch, T., Hill, K. and Kniewel, V.S. (2015), "Relationships, instruction, understandings: one district’s implementation of rounds", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 53 No. 5, pp. 625-641. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2014-0078

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles