To read this content please select one of the options below:

Citing and referencing habits in medicine and social sciences journals in 2019

Erika Alves dos Santos (Serviço de Biblioteca e Documentação-Biblioteca Dr. Eduardo Gabriel Saad, Fundação Jorge Duprat Figueiredo de Segurança e Medicina do Trabalho - Fundacentro, São Paulo, Brazil) (Department of Information and Culture (CBD), School of Communication and Arts (ECA), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil) (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, Digital Humanities Advanced Research Centre (DHARC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy)
Silvio Peroni (Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, Digital Humanities Advanced Research Centre (DHARC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy)
Marcos Luiz Mucheroni (Department of Information and Culture (CBD), School of Communication and Arts (ECA), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil)

Journal of Documentation

ISSN: 0022-0418

Article publication date: 30 April 2021

Issue publication date: 11 October 2021

351

Abstract

Purpose

This article explores citing and referencing systems in social sciences and medicine articles from different theoretical and practical perspectives, considering bibliographic references as a facet of descriptive representation.

Design/methodology/approach

The analysis of citing and referencing elements (i.e. bibliographic references, mentions, quotations and respective in-text reference pointers) identified citing and referencing habits within disciplines under consideration and errors occurring over the long term as stated by previous studies now expanded. Future expected trends of information retrieval from bibliographic metadata was gathered by approaching these referencing elements from the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) entities concepts.

Findings

Reference styles do not fully accomplish with their role of guiding authors and publishers on providing concise and well-structured bibliographic metadata within bibliographic references. Trends on representative description revision suggest a predicted distancing on the ways information is approached by bibliographic references and bibliographic catalogs adopting FRBR concepts, including the description levels adopted by each of them under the perspective of the FRBR entities concept.

Research limitations/implications

This study was based on a subset of medicine and social sciences articles published in 2019 and, therefore, it may not be taken as a final and broad coverage. Future studies expanding these approaches to other disciplines and chronological periods are encouraged.

Originality/value

By approaching citing and referencing issues as descriptive representation's facets, findings on this study may encourage further studies that will support information science and computer science on providing tools to become bibliographic metadata description simpler, better structured and more efficient facing the revision of descriptive representation actually in progress.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Library Service of the School of Communication and Arts (ECA) of University of São Paulo and the Library of the Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies of University of Bologna for the contribution in providing part of the articles that composed the sample of this study.

Citation

Santos, E.A.d., Peroni, S. and Mucheroni, M.L. (2021), "Citing and referencing habits in medicine and social sciences journals in 2019", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 77 No. 6, pp. 1321-1342. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2020-0144

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles