TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose Scholarly identity refers to endeavors by scholars to promote their reputation, work and networks using online platforms such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu and Twitter. This exploratory research investigates benefits and drawbacks of scholarly identity efforts and avenues for potential library support.Design/methodology/approach Data from 30 semi-structured phone interviews with faculty, doctoral students and academic librarians were qualitatively analyzed using the constant comparisons method (Charmaz, 2014) and Goffman’s (1959, 1967) theoretical concept of impression management.Findings Results reveal that use of online platforms enables academics to connect with others and disseminate their research. scholarly identity platforms have benefits, opportunities and offer possibilities for developing academic library support. They are also fraught with drawbacks/concerns, especially related to confusion, for-profit models and reputational risk.Research limitations/implications This exploratory study involves analysis of a small number of interviews (30) with self-selected social scientists from one discipline (communication) and librarians. It lacks gender, race/ethnicity and geographical diversity and focuses exclusively on individuals who use social networking sites for their scholarly identity practices.Social implications Results highlight benefits and risks of scholarly identity work and the potential for adopting practices that consider ethical dilemmas inherent in maintaining an online social media presence. They suggest continuing to develop library support that provides strategic guidance and information on legal responsibilities regarding copyright.Originality/value This research aims to understand the benefits and drawbacks of Scholarly Identity platforms and explore what support academic libraries might offer. It is among the first to investigate these topics comparing perspectives of faculty, doctoral students and librarians.
VL  - 76
IS  - 6
SN  - 0022-0418
DO  - 10.1108/JD-04-2019-0074
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2019-0074
AU  - Radford Marie L.
AU  - Kitzie Vanessa
AU  - Mikitish Stephanie
AU  - Floegel Diana
AU  - Radford Gary P.
AU  - Connaway Lynn Silipigni
PY  - 2020
Y1  - 2020/01/01
TI  - “People are reading your work,” scholarly identity and social networking sites
T2  - Journal of Documentation
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 1233
EP  - 1260
Y2  - 2024/04/25
ER  -