Assessing the reliability and validity of an outcomes star

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to assess the reliability, validity and use of the Family Star Plus, one of several Outcomes Stars increasingly used as part of outcomes-based accountability approaches in the delivery of family support services. The Family Star Plus measures progress towards effective parenting but a lack of evidence exists on its psychometric properties and suitability for use as an outcomes tool.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on data from 1,255 families receiving a pilot support service, Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal reliability of the 10-item scale, while principal component analysis (PCA) examined the number of constructs in the tool. Using matched data from evaluation of 80 families, correlations between the Family Star Plus and psychometrically validated tools were used to assess concurrent validity. Findings from a process evaluation explore practical issues around use of the tool.

Findings

Cronbach’s alpha indicated sufficient internal reliability of the Family Star Plus; however, the PCA raised questions concerning the internal validity the Star. Correlations between the Star and validated tools were not strong enough to support concurrent validity of the Star. Process evaluation findings highlight inconsistencies in Family Star Plus data capture, which may explain these differences.

Practical implications

Further work is required before the Family Star Plus can be considered for use as an outcome measure.

Originality/value

To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first peer-reviewed analysis of the psychometric qualities of the Family Star Plus.

Citation

Sweet, D., Winter, K., Neeson, L. and Connolly, P. (2020), "Assessing the reliability and validity of an outcomes star", Journal of Children's Services, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCS-03-2020-0009