To read this content please select one of the options below:

The belief in redeemability – version 2 (BiR-2) scale and its relation to desistance

Kevin O’Sullivan (School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia)
Chana Levin (Group Psychology Practice, Surry Hills, Australia)
David Bright (Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia)
Richard Kemp (School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia)

Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice

ISSN: 2056-3841

Article publication date: 4 December 2017

343

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to test the relationship between the belief in redeemability – Version 2 (BIR-2) Scale and desistance from crime. It also seeks to explore how patterns of responding on the BIR-2 with offenders compare to previous patterns of responding in the general public.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors report the results of a study of offenders using the belief in redeemability – Version 2 (BiR-2) scale. In total, 180 offenders under the supervision of the Community Corrections Service (formerly the Probation and Parole Service) of New South Wales completed the ten-item questionnaire and when these data were combined with demographic and reoffending data collected by Corrective Services New South Wales, 168 sets of useable data were collected. Scores on the BIR-2 scale were compared to Level of Service Inventory – Revised (LSI-R) score, Most Serious Offence category, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status, number of custodial sentences in previous five years, age, gender and reoffending.

Findings

Results showed that the sample overall was closely representative of the caseload from which the study sample was drawn (a metropolitan community corrections office) and that BIR-2 scores showed a small, significant, negative correlation with LSI-R scores. Analysis of re-offending data indicated a small, positive, but non-significant correlation with BIR-2. Implications of this are discussed and future research outlined.

Practical implications

The paper suggests that it is worth attempting to measure belief in redeemability in the broader context of a narrative approach to desistance.

Originality/value

This is the first time that a scale has been used to test the importance of a belief in redeemability quantitatively and to permit the use of multivariate analysis.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the assistance of SC from the Corporate Research and Statistics Branch of Corrective Services New South Wales who provided demographic and reoffending data.

Citation

O’Sullivan, K., Levin, C., Bright, D. and Kemp, R. (2017), "The belief in redeemability – version 2 (BiR-2) scale and its relation to desistance", Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, Vol. 3 No. 4, pp. 300-312. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-06-2017-0018

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles