To read this content please select one of the options below:

Drug sentencing in Brazil: factors influencing sentencing outcomes in the criminal courts of Recife/PE

Lais Meneses Brasileiro Dourado (Centre of Criminology and Socio-Legal Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, and Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction (CARMHA), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada)
Benedikt Fischer (Schools of Population Health and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction (CARMHA), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada and Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Osasco, Brazil)

Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice

ISSN: 2056-3841

Article publication date: 16 July 2021

Issue publication date: 17 November 2021

127

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to examine sentencing decisions for drug-trafficking offences in the criminal courts of the city of Recife to address a gap in quantitative research on drug sentencing and incarceration in Brazil.

Design/methodology/approach

Using original data obtained from the Court of Justice for Pernambuco, the research used multivariate regression analysis to investigate the effect of case processing, offender, and offence characteristics on sentence length.

Findings

A key finding of the research is the influence of two legal factors on sentence length: admitting to a drug-trafficking offence and being categorized as “mitigated trafficking”. Results also indicate that first-time defendants were more likely to be categorized as mitigated trafficking, stressing the importance of criminal history on predicting sentencing outcomes. “Mitigated trafficking” is a distinct category of drug-trafficking created by the Drug Law nº. 11.343 (2006) to protect defendants considered novices in the illicit drug market from receiving longer imprisonment sentences.

Practical implications

The findings suggest that the policy strategy of having a legal distinction for a specific type of defendant appears to be effective in impacting sentence length for drug-trafficking convictions. Future research could explore how similar strategies could be adopted to influence sentencing for other vulnerable groups. However, focussing on a defendant records or prior convictions as an eligibility criterion could disproportionately impact defendants who are caught in a cycle of re-offending for socio-economic reasons or a need to finance a substance use disorder.

Originality/value

This research address a gap in quantitative sentencing research in Brazil and contributes to the broader literature by presenting results that are aligned with previous studies conducted in North America.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Anthony Doob, PhD (Centre of Criminology & Socio-Legal Studies, University of Toronto) for providing essential support and advice in various aspects of this research study.Funding: this research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Citation

Brasileiro Dourado, L.M. and Fischer, B. (2021), "Drug sentencing in Brazil: factors influencing sentencing outcomes in the criminal courts of Recife/PE", Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 335-344. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRPP-02-2021-0006

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles