To read this content please select one of the options below:

Unethically keeping the change while demeaning the act

Lifeng Yang (Department of Marketing, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USA)
Scott Vitell (Department of Marketing, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USA)
Victoria D. Bush (Department of Marketing, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USA)

Journal of Consumer Marketing

ISSN: 0736-3761

Article publication date: 9 January 2017

582

Abstract

Purpose

In this research, the authors aim to identify a situation when a consumer’s judgment of unethical behavior is not consistent with their intention to act ethically.

Design/methodology/approach

Across two studies, participants were asked to evaluate how ethical an actor’s behavior was when the actor knowingly kept surplus change from a distracted cashier. The identity of the actor was manipulated to be of either high or low similarity to the participants. The business where the distracted cashier worked for was described as either locally owned or a chain. Participant’s intended action in similar situation was assessed after their evaluation of how ethical/unethical the actor’s behavior was.

Findings

While participants generally find the actor’s behavior to be unethical, identity overlap between the participant and the actor is found to moderate how likely one is to emulate the actor’s behavior in a similar situation. Identity overlap is found to positively predict one’s likelihood to act like the actor in the scenarios. Whether the business was locally owned or a chain was not found to affect one’s ethical judgment or ethical intention.

Research limitations/implications

Identity overlap is found to positively predict one’s likelihood to act like the actor in the scenarios.

Practical implications

Whether the business was locally owned or a chain was not found to affect one’s ethical judgment nor ethical intention. While participants in general do show that they judge the actor’s behavior as unethical, identity overlap between the participant and the actor moderates how likely one is to act like the actor if put in the same scenario.

Social implications

The research suggests that consumers are more likely to act unethically when they identify with “similar” others, regardless of how unethical they consider that behavior to be.

Originality/value

This research suggests that even when consumers acknowledge that certain behavior against a business is unethical, their intention to engage in the unethical behavior may not be predicted by their judgment of how unethical the behavior is. Instead, consumers are likely to emulate unethical behavior of those whom they consider similar to themselves, regardless of how unethical they judge that behavior to be.

Keywords

Citation

Yang, L., Vitell, S. and Bush, V.D. (2017), "Unethically keeping the change while demeaning the act", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2016-1715

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles