TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose There is much anecdotal evidence that birds and their droppings are a major problem for the heritage profession. The purpose of this paper is to examine how serious heritage practitioners consider the bird impact to be.Design/methodology/approach An online survey was conducted of 59 Australian heritage professionals of between one and >20 year’s experience in the field.Findings Bird impacts were not considered of major concern to buildings. The longer experience a practitioner had, the less likely the impacts were considered an issue. Feral pigeons were deemed the most problematic, followed by cockatoos, starlings, swallows, seagulls, mynas, sparrows, cormorants, ibis, ducks and birds of prey. The professionals ranked common deterrent methods. The highest-ranking deterrents were bird netting and bird spikes, but they were only considered moderately effective. The costs of installation and maintenance, as well the ease of installation, were all deemed significantly less important than the physical impact, the aesthetic sympathy and the effectiveness of a deterrent method.Practical implications This study indicates that the impact of birds on buildings in Australia may be of less concern than previously thought, and may be driven by other factors (i.e. aesthetics, commercial companies) rather than actual effects.Originality/value This is first study of its kind that surveyed the experiences of a wide range of heritage practitioners.
VL  - 8
IS  - 1
SN  - 2044-1266
DO  - 10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2016-0042
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2016-0042
AU  - Spennemann Dirk H.R.
AU  - Pike Melissa
AU  - Watson Maggie J.
PY  - 2018
Y1  - 2018/01/01
TI  - Bird impacts on heritage buildings: Australian practitioners’ perspectives and experiences
T2  - Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 62
EP  - 75
Y2  - 2024/09/22
ER  -