To read this content please select one of the options below:

Pricing and advertising decisions in O2O supply chain with the presence of consumers’ anticipated regret

Qiongqiong Gu (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China)
Rong Zhang (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China)
Bin Liu (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China)

Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing

ISSN: 0885-8624

Article publication date: 27 July 2022

Issue publication date: 21 March 2023

521

Abstract

Purpose

Due to product value uncertainty, consumers do not know the product matching rate before they get the product, which is the probability of product fitness. Taking the consumers’ anticipated regret into account, this paper aims to develop a theoretical model to explore how the anticipated regret affects pricing and advertising decisions and profits of retailers in the online to offline (O2O) supply chain.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper considers an O2O supply chain consisting of an e-retailer and a brick-and-mortar retailer; both retailers cooperate to provide buying online and pick up in-store (BOPS) for consumers.

Findings

It shows three major findings. Retailers should decide whether to introduce BOPS channel according to the matching rate of the product when the BOPS channel is not very convenient for consumers. When the BOPS channel does not exist in the market, the profits of two retailers increase with the online regret of consumers, while the BOPS channel exists in the market and the matching rate of the product is low, the higher offline regret can enable both retailers to increase the profits; furthermore, when the matching rate is high, the higher degree of online regret can bring more profit to the O2O supply chain. Therefore, both retailers can take measures together to induce consumers’ regrets according to the different matching rates, which makes both retailers obtain more profits. Counterintuitively, consumer surplus will not always increase due to consideration of anticipated regret.

Research limitations/implications

The model has some limitations that are worth further discussing. First, in practice, the O2O supply chain includes many forms except the BOPS channel, for example, order online and pick-up in-store (ROPS) channel; future research can discuss and consider the impact of consumers’ anticipated regret on ROPS. Second, the authors consider that O2O is a supply chain composed of two retailers. In reality, there is also a situation where an oligopoly retailer opens two channels to realize O2O supply chain, in the case the inventory decision-making of the product is worth studying. Finally, to highlight the impact of the anticipated regret on consumers’ decision-making, the return of the product is not considered. Future research can take the return of the product into account to assess the robustness of the results.

Originality/value

The contributions are in two main aspects. First, this paper considers an O2O supply chain with consumer value uncertainty, where there are duopoly retailers in the market and most of the existing literature focus on oligopoly retailer operates both online and offline channels; meanwhile, consumers’ value perceptions of the product is deterministic. Second, this paper explores how the consumer anticipated channel regret affects the pricing and advertising decisions of O2O supply chain, and the authors take behavioral theory into account when studying omnichannel operations, while most studies on anticipated regret consider traditional two-stage price reduction management, product innovation, etc.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Science Foundations of China through grant number 71971134.

Citation

Gu, Q., Zhang, R. and Liu, B. (2023), "Pricing and advertising decisions in O2O supply chain with the presence of consumers’ anticipated regret", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 1135-1149. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2022-0022

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles