To read this content please select one of the options below:

Disclosure of key audit matters (KAMs) in financial reporting: evidence from an emerging economy

Md Mustafizur Rahaman (Department of Accounting, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh)
Md Moazzem Hossain (Murdoch Business School, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia)
Md. Borhan Uddin Bhuiyan (School of Accountancy, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand)

Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies

ISSN: 2042-1168

Article publication date: 18 August 2022

Issue publication date: 5 July 2023

1339

Abstract

Purpose

The new audit regulation for disclosure of key audit matters (KAMs) in financial reporting has been introduced in both developed and developing countries. This study investigates the influence of three distinctive sets of variables, namely industry features, firm characteristics and auditor attributes, on the extent, pattern and level of disclosure of KAMs by companies listed in Bangladesh, an emerging economy.

Design/methodology/approach

The study uses qualitative and quantitative research approaches to investigate the pattern of disclosure of KAMs and their determinants. With a sample of 447 firm-year observations from companies listed on the Dhaka Stock Exchange over 2018–2020, the study reveals industry-level, firm-level and auditor-specific characteristics that affect KAMs' communication in the new audit reporting model.

Findings

The findings suggest that significant differences exist between firms in the number and types of KAMs reported and the extent of their disclosure. The study findings also observed variations both within and across different industry sectors. Highly regulated firms disclose a greater number of KAMs, while environmentally sensitive firms are found to provide a greater detail of the issues presented as KAMs. Further, both firm size and age positively impact the number of KAMs disclosed and the extent of the disclosure provided. Big-4-affiliated auditors do not issue a significantly higher number of KAMs but deliver extensive details to their KAMs description, compared to non-Big-4 auditors. In addition, while auditors, in general, tend to issue boilerplate KAMs, Big-4 associates are found to disclose more new KAMs. However, audit fees and auditor rotation do not influence KAMs disclosure.

Research limitations/implications

This study is based on two years of publicly available data. However, future studies could consider in-depth interviews to explore the motivation behind KAMs' disclosure in Bangladesh and other developing countries with similar cultural and contextual values.

Practical implications

These findings have substantial policy considerations for improving firms' audit quality and, thus, their financial reporting quality, with implications for national and international standard-setters, regulators and other stakeholders.

Originality/value

This study is one of the earliest endeavours to investigate KAMs in a context of an emerging country, such as Bangladesh, which adopted KAMs' disclosure in 2018.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Associate Editor Venancio Tauringana and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and constructive suggestions.

Citation

Rahaman, M.M., Hossain, M.M. and Bhuiyan, M.B.U. (2023), "Disclosure of key audit matters (KAMs) in financial reporting: evidence from an emerging economy", Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 666-702. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-11-2021-0355

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles