To read this content please select one of the options below:

Everyday genocide: femicide, transicide and the responsibility to protect

Katerina Standish (National Centre Peace and Conflict, University of Otago – Dunedin Campus, Dunedin, New Zealand)

Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research

ISSN: 1759-6599

Article publication date: 31 December 2021

Issue publication date: 23 May 2022

303

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to establish a conceptual connection between gender-based violence (GBV) and genocide. Victims of gendercide, such as femicide and transicide, should be eligible for protections assigned to victims of genocide, including the Responsibility to Protect (R2P).

Design/methodology/approach

This study examines genocide, gendercide, femicide, transicide and the R2P doctrine to formulate a platform of engagement from which to argue the alignment and congruence of genocide with gendercide. Using a content analysis of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees definition of GBV, and Article II of the Genocide Convention (GC) five “directive” facets are examined, namely, identity, physical violence, psychological violence, oppressive violence and repressive violence.

Findings

Expressions of physical violence, psychological violence, oppressive violence and repressive violence reflected similarity, whereas the GCs omit sex and gender as facets of identity group inclusion. The only variation is the encapsulation of identity factors included in the acts of harm.

Practical implications

The elevation of gendercide to the status of genocide would permit us the leverage to make it not only illegal to permit gendercide – internationally or in-country – but make it illegal not to intervene, too.

Social implications

Deliberate harm based on sex and gender are crimes against people because of their real or perceived group membership, and as such, should be included in genocide theory and prevention.

Originality/value

This study explores a new conceptual basis for addressing gendercidal violence nationally to include sex and gender victim groups typically excluded from formal parameters of inclusion and address due to limitations in Article II. The analysis of genocide alongside GBV may inform scholars and activists in the aim to end gendered violence.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the EIC of JACPR, and anonymous reviewers for their consideration of this work and their enormously valuable comments. She is grateful to Dr Christina Smylitopoulos for her comments on the manuscript, and wishes to extend very special thanks to Dr. Alexandra del Pilar Ortiz-Ayala for topical contributions on Genocide and the Responsibility to Protect.

Citation

Standish, K. (2022), "Everyday genocide: femicide, transicide and the responsibility to protect", Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 215-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-10-2021-0642

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles