To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below:

Warfare, atrocities, and political participation: eastern Africa

Carol R. Ember (Human Relations Area Files, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA)
Eric C. Jones (University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA)
Ian Skoggard (Human Relations Area Files, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA)
Teferi Abate Adem (Human Relations Area Files, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA)

Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research

ISSN: 1759-6599

Article publication date: 12 January 2018

Issue publication date: 31 January 2019

Abstract

Purpose

Ember et al. (1992) addressed whether the “democracies rarely fight each other” hypothesis held true in the anthropological record of societies of various sizes and scales around the world. They indeed found that more participatory polities had less internal warfare – or warfare between one society’s territorial units (e.g. bands, villages, districts). The purpose of this paper is to examine when political participation would have similar effects in eastern Africa, and whether more participatory polities commit fewer atrocities against each other.

Design/methodology/approach

A cross-cultural sample of 46 societies from eastern Africa was used to retest the original Ember et al. (1992) multiple regression model and revised post-hoc models. The team read ethnographies to code for levels of political participation at the local and multilocal levels. Other variables came from previous research including warfare and atrocity variables (Ember et al., 2013).

Findings

The Ember et al. (1992) model did not replicate in eastern Africa, but analysis with additional variables (degree of formal leadership, presence of state-level organization, and threat of natural disasters that destroy food supplies) suggested that greater local political participation does predict less internal warfare. Also, more participatory polities were less likely to commit atrocities in the course of internal warfare.

Originality/value

This study demonstrates regional comparisons are important because they help us evaluate the generalizability of worldwide findings. Additionally, adding atrocities to the study of democracy and warfare is new and suggests reduced atrocities as an additional benefit of political participation.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The comparative research in eastern Africa was supported by the Office of Naval Research ONR under MURI Grant No. N00014-08-1-0921 to George Mason University with a subaward to the Human Relations Area Files, and by the National Science Foundation (SMA No. 1416651). The earlier Ember et al. (1992) work from which some of these data were derived was supported by the political science program and the cultural anthropology program at the National Science Foundation, the United States Institutes of Peace, and the World Society Foundation (Switzerland).

Citation

Ember, C.R., Jones, E.C., Skoggard, I. and Adem, T.A. (2019), "Warfare, atrocities, and political participation: eastern Africa", Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JACPR-05-2017-0290

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited