To read this content please select one of the options below:

The dynamic impact of board composition on CSR practices and their mutual effect on organizational returns

Sitara Karim (School of Economics, Finance and Banking, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia)
Norlida Abdul Manab (School of Economics, Finance, and Banking, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia)
Rusmawati Binti Ismail (School of Economics, Finance and Banking, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia)

Journal of Asia Business Studies

ISSN: 1558-7894

Article publication date: 6 January 2020

Issue publication date: 15 June 2020

835

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it aims to investigate the dynamic impact of board composition (board size, board independence and board diversity) on independent corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices (marketplace, environment, community and workplace). Second, it tends to examine the mutual effect of board composition and CSR practices on organizational returns (return on assets and Tobin’s Q) of 631 Malaysian PLCs listed on Bursa Malaysia during 2006-2017.

Design/methodology/approach

The dynamic model (system GMM) provided by Arellano and Bond (1991) and Arellano and Bover (1995) is used for estimations that control for potential dynamic endogeneity, reverse causality, unobserved heterogeneity and simultaneity problems.

Findings

Findings reveal weak linkage between board composition and CSR practices where only board diversity is found to be positively linked to marketplace practices of CSR. Further, the mutual impact of board composition and CSR practices on organizational returns suggests board size be positive and board independence to be negative with Tobin’s Q. Board diversity is negative with ROA and positive with Tobin’s Q. Conversely, CSR practices indicate marketplace practices are positive and community practices are negative with Tobin’s Q, environment practices are insignificant with performance, whereas workplace practices are positive with ROA and negative with Tobin’s Q.

Practical implications

This research is practically considerable for Bursa Malaysia, Securities Commission Malaysia, policymakers, stakeholders, investors and managers. For academia, the theoretical linkages between agency theory, resource dependence theory, resource-based view and stakeholder theory are highlighted. Moreover, methodological underpinnings are also novel for academicians as well as for practitioners.

Originality/value

The paper uncovers multiple aspects: first, it elaborates the dynamic relationship between board composition and CSR practices; second, it examines the combined effect of board composition and CSR practices on company’s accounting and market gains; finally, the study controls for dynamic endogeneity that is the main econometric problem for CG-CSR-performance relationships.

Keywords

Citation

Karim, S., Manab, N.A. and Ismail, R.B. (2020), "The dynamic impact of board composition on CSR practices and their mutual effect on organizational returns", Journal of Asia Business Studies, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-07-2019-0214

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles