To read this content please select one of the options below:

Is conditional conservatism a source of deviations of financial statements from Benford's Law?

Tri Tri Nguyen (University of Brighton, Brighton, UK) (University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)
Chau Minh Duong (University of East London, London, UK) (Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)
Nguyet Thi Minh Nguyen (University of Roehampton, London, UK)

Journal of Applied Accounting Research

ISSN: 0967-5426

Article publication date: 12 January 2022

Issue publication date: 17 October 2022

282

Abstract

Purpose

In this paper, the authors examine the association between conditional conservatism and deviations of the first digits of financial statement items from what are expected by Benford's Law.

Design/methodology/approach

This research uses data of companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. The authors measure deviations of first digits from Benford's Law following Amiram et al. (2015) and firm-year conditional conservatism following previous studies (Basu, 1997; Khan and Watts, 2009; García Lara et al., 2016). The authors use multiple regressions to provide evidence for their hypothesis.

Findings

The results show that conditional conservatism is positively associated with deviations from Benford's Law. The findings are robust across different measures of deviations and conditional conservatism. Also, the authors find that the relationship between deviations from Benford's Law and conditional conservatism is more pronounced for firms with debt issuance, and for leveraged firms facing financial distress. Next, the authors’ analyses confirm previous evidence by showing that the first digits of financial statement items of UK listed companies conform to Benford's Law at the firm-specific level and the market level, and deviations of income statements are larger than those of balance sheets and cash flow statements.

Research limitations/implications

The research makes significant contributions to the literature. First, this is the first study that provides empirical evidence suggesting that conditional conservatism may be a source of deviations from Benford’s Law. Second, the authors provide evidence confirming previous US findings (e.g. Amiram et al., 2015) showing that the distributions of first digits of financial statement items of UK listed companies also conform to Benford's Law.

Practical implications

The authors’ findings have implications for auditors. Auditors should be aware of “false positive” for material misstatements when using Benford's Law as a risk assessment procedure. While both conditional conservatism and earnings management are related to deviations from Benford's Law, conservatism-related biases could indicate less audit risks.

Originality/value

The authors provide new and original evidence suggesting that conditional conservatism is related to deviations from Benford's Law.

Keywords

Citation

Nguyen, T.T., Duong, C.M. and Nguyen, N.T.M. (2022), "Is conditional conservatism a source of deviations of financial statements from Benford's Law?", Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 23 No. 5, pp. 1024-1046. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-02-2021-0037

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles