Guest editorial: International marketing perspectives on digital platforms and their ecosystems

Timo Mandler (Department of Marketing and International Business, TBS Business School, Barcelona, Spain)
Jun Luo (University of Nottingham – Ningbo China, Ningbo, China)
Natalia Yannopoulou (Newcastle University Business School, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)
Jochen Wirtz (National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore)

International Marketing Review

ISSN: 0265-1335

Article publication date: 1 October 2024

Issue publication date: 1 October 2024

367

Citation

Mandler, T., Luo, J., Yannopoulou, N. and Wirtz, J. (2024), "Guest editorial: International marketing perspectives on digital platforms and their ecosystems", International Marketing Review, Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 849-855. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-09-2024-392

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2024, Emerald Publishing Limited


The rise of digital platforms

Digitalization has led to the emergence of platform businesses that have disrupted many industries and continue to transform the global economy (Nambisan et al., 2019; Rangaswamy et al., 2020; Wirtz et al., 2019). Digital platforms are Internet-based socio-technical systems that mediate interactions between different groups of users through an interface (e.g. a website or an app), and they come in various shapes and sizes. Examples include social media platforms that provide billions of users opportunities to interact with each other (e.g. Facebook, LinkedIn and Weibo) (Sheth, 2020), online marketplaces that connect buyers and sellers of products and services across the globe (e.g. Alibaba, Etsy and Booking.com) (Bei and Gielens, 2020) and sharing economy platforms that enable shared access to underutilized assets, such as space, vehicles and skills (e.g. Airbnb, Didi and Fiverr) (Yuan et al., 2024).

Due to their modular architecture and scalability, digital platforms can grow into large ecosystems incorporating diverse sets of actors who contribute different resources and capabilities to the process of value co-creation (Tiwana, 2014). As a result, the locus of value creation does not lie within the firm (i.e. the platform) but in the complex, multilateral interactions taking place within the larger ecosystem that it orchestrates and governs (Li et al., 2019). Due to this complexity, paired with an enormous economic footprint, digital platforms have sparked much interest across a number of disciplines, including marketing (e.g. Rangaswamy et al., 2020), international business (e.g. Brouthers et al., 2016), management (e.g. McIntyre and Srinivasan, 2016), information systems (e.g. Constantinides et al., 2018) and economics (Hagiu and Wright, 2015).

International marketing perspectives on digital platforms

Marketing is critical for digital platforms to succeed. It plays a key role in (1) attracting users to a platform to boost critical network effects, (2) elevating the quantity and quality of interactions to increase revenue and (3) reducing users’ transaction costs as well as a platform’s production costs (Rangaswamy et al., 2020). Accordingly, marketing scholars have shed light on various phenomena related to digital platforms, such as platform adoption (e.g. Kumar et al., 2021), platform governance (e.g. Bajde et al., 2023), platform exploitation (e.g. Zhou et al., 2022), network effects (e.g. Chu and Manchanda, 2016), user-generated content (e.g. Hochstein et al., 2023), firm-generated content (e.g. Liadeli et al., 2023), online brand communities (e.g. Wong, 2021) and brand platformization (Wichmann et al., 2022).

However, few marketing studies on digital platforms have adopted an international perspective. The narrow focus on single (often developed) country markets is surprising. This is especially true given the enormous economic potential of digital platforms is rooted in the very fact that most of them are designed to scale and rapidly expand beyond the borders of their home country shortly after their inception (Monaghan et al., 2020; Nambisan et al., 2019). For example, Uber started expanding internationally just two years after it was founded in 2009 and managed to enter almost 70 countries within six years (Ghemawat, 2016).

Yet, the internationalization of digital platforms is far from trivial and presents substantial challenges. By 2016, Uber had sunk over $2 billion before giving up on its conquest of the Chinese ride-sharing market (Salomon, 2016) – a failure that was attributed to Uber’s inability to navigate China’s cultural, political and economic complexities (Kozlenkova et al., 2021; Wirtz and Tang, 2016). Similarly, e-commerce giant Groupon withdrew from the South Korean market after a three-year struggle against local competitors who were more attuned to the unique characteristics of Korean consumers (Choi, 2014). By contrast, the streaming platform Spotify succeeded in firmly establishing itself in India, despite intense competition from local (e.g. JioSaavn and Gaana) and international players (e.g. Apple Music and YouTube Music) (Sekhose, 2022). When entering India in 2019, Spotify adapted its marketing program to accommodate the market’s cultural, economic and technological complexities. The app is available in 12 Indian languages (including Hindi, Punjabi and Tamil) and features algorithmic “city playlists” based on location (e.g. Mumbai, Delhi and Chennai), with playlists curated by Indian music experts as well as music from popular Bollywood movies (Spotify, 2019). In addition, Spotify launched a minimalist version of its application to improve accessibility for low-end smartphones with limited storage and poor Internet connections (Sekhose, 2022). This strategy helped Spotify achieve a market share of 26% in 2023 (Statista, 2024) and turned the Indian market into a key driver of Spotify’s global growth (Gurbaxani, 2023).

These examples underscore international marketing’s raison d’être: Context matters, also in the digital economy. Like every firm that operates internationally, digital platforms are confronted with international markets that can significantly differ in various regards, such as regulatory, infrastructural, socio-cultural and economic conditions (i.e. the RISE framework; Mandler and Wichmann, 2025). These contextual factors can pose critical contingencies for digital platforms’ strategy and architecture, business operations and performance.

Overview of the special issue

Our call for papers highlighted a “blue ocean” of research opportunities related to digital platforms and ecosystems from an international perspective. This special issue of the International Marketing Review sets sail to explore some of these uncharted waters and hopefully inspires more research at the interface of digital and international marketing. It includes conceptual and empirical contributions by 40 scholars from 10 countries across the globe. Their work can be divided into three distinct groups, i.e. (1) studies examining the internationalization of digital platforms, (2) studies exploring how firms that transact on digital platforms can use them to internationalize and (3) studies focusing on questions related to international e-commerce. Table 1 provides a summary of all contributions to this special issue.

International marketing perspectives on digital platforms and ecosystems

AuthorsTitleMain focusMethodKey finding(s)
Internationalization of digital platforms
  • Weng, Liu, Ye, Liu and Huang

Platform success in the international marketplace: Reconfiguring digital resources for marketing agilityRole of versatile digital resource-enabled reconfiguration activities in marketing agility buildingQualitative research (case study)Digital platforms build marketing agility and success through three versatile digital resource-based reconfiguration mechanisms: Recombination of digital artifacts, repurposing human capital and cross-pollination of markets
  • Nim, Pedada and Hewett

Digital marketing ecosystems and global market expansion: Current state and future research agendaClarification of the conceptualization and role of digital marketing ecosystems for the global expansion of multinational enterprisesConceptual workDigital marketing ecosystems enable firms from developed markets (DM) and emerging markets (EM) to expand globally with greater flexibility. They can help firms overcome infrastructural disparity, reputation gaps (EM firms expanding to DM) and institutional voids (DM firms expanding to EM)
  • Surana, Chavan, Kumar, and Chirico

Understanding the internationalization of digital platform firms: Developing the platform-OLI (P-OLI) frameworkInvestigation of the advantages that help digital platform firms to succeed during their internationalizationQualitative research (case study)Digital platform firms access various types of open resources (O), rely on linkages (L) and extract varied information and knowledge (I) to gain advantages that ease the internationalization process.
  • Amissah, Sarpong, Boakye and Carrington

A meaning-making perspective on digital ridesharing platforms in underdeveloped marketsCollective contest of interpretations of digital platform business models in the context of underdeveloped marketsConceptual workA framework is proposed that is anchored in six propositions. It offers insights into how digital platform businesses can adapt to address and align with the idiosyncrasies of underdeveloped markets with weak institutions
Firms using digital platforms to internationalize
  • Gong, He and Lengler

Internationalization through digital platforms: A systematic review and future research agendaReview and synthesis of extant research on how traditional firms enter foreign markets using digital platformsLiterature reviewThe developed framework of antecedents, mediators, moderators and outcomes of digital platform use in firm internationalization provides a comprehensive overview of the status quo and highlights avenues for future research
  • Da Rocha, Neves da Fonseca and Kogut

Small firm internationalization using digital platform ecosystems: An assessment and future research directionsReview and synthesis of existing studies on the internationalization of small firms via digital platformsLiterature reviewThe proposed framework links small firms’ resources, capabilities and environmental factors to their adoption of digital platforms for internationalization and related outcomes. The authors present research questions related to different framework elements
  • Jean, Kim and Cadogan

Antecedents and performance outcomes of exporters’ use of Internet B2B platformsAntecedents and outcomes of exporters’ use of different services offered by Internet-based business-to-business (I-B2B) platformsQuantitative research (survey)Exporters’ use of I-B2B platform services is positively associated with cost advantages, export diversity strategies, psychic distance and domestic regulatory uncertainty. The performance consequences depend on the service type and the exporter’s transparency strategy
  • Hu, Filipescu and Pergelova

Understanding SMEs’ internationalization through digital platforms: The role of knowledge sharing and consumer educationConsumer education and knowledge sharing during the internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) via digital platformsQualitative research (case study)During SMEs’ platform-based internationalization, learning processes take place in a bidirectional way due to interactions among multiple stakeholders, activating consumer education and knowledge sharing
  • Olivieri and Testa

Social media platforms use in startups’ international marketing strategies: A multiple case studyRole of social media in supporting startups’ entrance to foreign marketsQualitative research (case study)Social media helps startups develop relationships with stakeholders abroad, penetrate local business networks, build general brand awareness and convey their offering’s positioning
Digital platform-enabled e-commerce
  • Lee, Yalcinkaya and Griffith

Examining the relationship of country-level digital ad spend and cross-border e-commerce buyers under cultural and political globalizationModerating role of formal and informal institutional globalization regarding the effect of digital ad spend on cross-border commerceQuantitative research (secondary data)Digital ad spend (at the country level) is positively related to the share of cross-border e-commerce buyers in a country. Political globalization strengthens the impact of digital ad spend on consumers’ participation in cross-border e-commerce, whereas cultural globalization weakens it
  • Jürgensmeier, Bischoff and Skiera

Opportunities for self-preferencing in international online marketplacesInternational prevalence of vertically integrated offers in online marketplacesQuantitative research (secondary data)Most online marketplaces tend to be vertically integrated, offering them opportunities for self-preferencing (i.e. platform providers favor their own offers over those of competitors). The analysis reveals significant cross-national differences in self-preferencing, potentially due to regulatory differences
  • Kim, Ryoo, Zdravkovic and Yoon

Consumer resistance to price transparency in high-end digital retail from high-equity countries: A should-want conflict perspectivePrice transparency in high-end digital retail and the moderating role of country equityQuantitative research (experiments)Price transparency might benefit regular-priced products but backfires for premium-priced products. Country equity is an important boundary condition for this backfiring effect in that it is more pronounced for products from high-equity countries than low-equity ones

Source(s): Created by authors

References

Bajde, D., Golf-Papez, M., Kolar, T. and Culiberg, B. (2023), “The multiple logics of market-based governance: how the sharing economy platform Airbnb governs user conduct”, Marketing Theory, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 367-396, doi: 10.1177/14705931231202359.

Bei, Z. and Gielens, K. (2020), “Overcoming institutional and infrastructure weaknesses in China via online third-party marketplaces”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 3-19, doi: 10.1177/1069031x20915850.

Brouthers, K.D., Geisser, K.D. and Rothlauf, F. (2016), “Explaining the internationalization of Ibusiness firms”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 47 No. 5, pp. 513-534, doi: 10.1057/jibs.2015.20.

Choi, K. (2014), “Groupon to withdraw from Korea in 1st half”, The Korea Times, (March), available at: https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/tech/2023/02/419_152733.html (accessed 14 July 2024).

Chu, J. and Manchanda, P. (2016), “Quantifying cross and direct network effects in online consumer-to-consumer platforms”, Marketing Science, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 831-998, doi: 10.1287/mksc.2016.0976.

Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O. and Parker, G.G. (2018), “Platforms and infrastructures in the digital age”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 381-400, doi: 10.1287/isre.2018.0794.

Ghemawat, P. (2016), “What Uber's China deal says about the limits of platforms”, Harvard Business Review, available at: https://hbr.org/2016/08/what-ubers-china-deal-says-about-the-limits-of-platforms (accessed 14 July 2024).

Gurbaxani, A. (2023), “India is driving Spotify's global growth – will revenue follow?”, Billboard, available at: https://www.billboard.com/pro/india-spotify-global-growth-revenue/ (accessed 14 July 2024).

Hagiu, A. and Wright, J. (2015), “Multi-sided platforms”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 43 No. C, pp. 162-174, doi: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.03.003.

Hochstein, R., Harmeling, C.M. and Perko, T. (2023), “Toward a theory of consumer digital trust: meta-analytical evidence of its role in the effectiveness of user-generated content”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, online first.

Kozlenkova, I.V., Lee, J.-Y., Xiang, D. and Palmatier, R.W. (2021), “Sharing economy: international marketing strategies”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 52 No. 8, pp. 1445-1473, doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00393-z.

Kumar, V., Nim, N. and Agarwal, A. (2021), “Platform-based mobile payments adoption in emerging and developed countries: role of country-level heterogeneity and network effects”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 52 No. 8, pp. 1529-1558, doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00346-6.

Li, J., Chen, L., Yi, J., Mao, J. and Liao, J. (2019), “Ecosystem-specific advantages in international digital commerce”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 50 No. 9, pp. 1448-1463, doi: 10.1057/s41267-019-00263-3.

Liadeli, G., Sotgui, F. and Verlegh, P.W.J. (2023), “A meta-analysis of the effects of brands' owned social media on social media engagement and sales”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 87 No. 3, pp. 406-427, doi: 10.1177/00222429221123250.

Mandler, T. and Wichmann, J.R.K. (2025), “The RISE of digital platforms”, Review of Marketing Research, forthcoming.

McIntyre, D. and Srinivasan, A. (2016), “Networks, platforms, and synergy: emerging views and next steps”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 141-160, doi: 10.1002/smj.2596.

Monaghan, S., Tippmann, E. and Coviello, N. (2020), “Born digitals: thoughts on their internationalization and a research agenda”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 11-22, doi: 10.1057/s41267-019-00290-0.

Nambisan, S., Zahra, S.A. and Luo, Y. (2019), “Global platforms and ecosystems: implications for international business theories”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 50 No. 9, pp. 1464-1486, doi: 10.1057/s41267-019-00262-4.

Rangaswamy, A., Moch, N., Felten, C., van Bruggen, G., Wieringa, J.E. and Wirtz, J. (2020), “The role of marketing in digital business platforms”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 51 No. C, pp. 72-90, doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2020.04.006.

Salomon, R. (2016), “Why Uber couldn't crack China”, Fortune, available at: https://fortune.com/2016/08/07/uber-china-didi-chuxing/ (accessed 14 July 2024).

Sekhose, M. (2022), “Breaking down Spotify's stay in India so far, and what's next for the platform”, The Hindustan Times, (August), available at: https://tech.hindustantimes.com/tech/news/breaking-down-spotify-s-short-five-month-stay-in-india-story-rIGIvc05hfMny6icVM3XfP-15.html (accessed 14 July 2024).

Sheth, J.N. (2020), “Borderless media: rethinking international marketing”, Journal of International Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 3-12, doi: 10.1177/1069031x19897044.

Spotify (2019), “Spotify launches in India”, available at: https://newsroom.spotify.com/2019-02-26/spotify-launches-in-india/ (accessed 14 July 2024).

Statista (2024), “Contribution of Spotify to music streams across India in financial years 2020 and 2023”, available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1381919/spotify-music-stream-share-in-india/ (accessed 14 July 2024).

Tiwana, A. (2014), Platform Ecosystems: Aligning Architecture, Governance, and Strategy, Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, MA.

Wichmann, J.R.K., Wiegand, N. and Reinartz, W.J. (2022), “The platformization of brands”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 86 No. 1, pp. 109-131, doi: 10.1177/00222429211054073.

Wirtz, J. and Tang, C. (2016), “Uber: competing as marketing leader in the US vs. being a distant second in China”, in Wirtz, J. and Lovelock, C. (Eds), Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy, 8th ed., World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 626-743.

Wirtz, J., Fung So, K.K., Mody, M.A., Liu, S.Q. and Chun, H.H. (2019), “Platforms in the peer-to-peer sharing economy”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 452-483, doi: 10.1108/josm-11-2018-0369.

Wong, A. (2021), “The nature of peer-initiated brand communities on social media platforms”, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 1629-1647, doi: 10.1002/cb.1978.

Yuan, R., Chen, Y. and Mandler, T. (2024), “It takes two to tango: the role of interactivity in enhancing customer engagement on sharing economy platforms”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 178 C, 114658, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114658.

Zhou, K.Q., Allen, B.J., Gretz, R.T. and Houston, M.B. (2022), “Platform exploitation: when service agents defect with customers from online service platforms”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 86 No. 2, pp. 105-125, doi: 10.1177/00222429211001311.

Acknowledgements

We thank the reviewers who have generously supported this special issue with their time and expertise (listed in alphabetical order of surname): Arpita Agnihotri, Eleftherios Alamanos, Hannan Amoozad Majdiraji, Daniel Arubayi, Salma Ayari, Saurabh Bhattacharya, Mariana Bassi Suter, Fabian Bartsch, Markus Blut, Reynald Brion, Francesco Caputo, Jieke Chen, Yanyan Chen, Nuno Crespo, Dinara Davlembayeva, Vasileios Davvetas, Giandomenico Di Domenico, Diana Filipescu, Raffaele Filieri, Jelena Filipovic, Sara Fraccastoro, Zeynep Müge Güzel, Martin Heinberg, Jiaxun He, Xinming He, Ruiyang Hong, Fiona Hurd, Sergio Ibáñez Sánchez, Tinka Krüger, Constantinos Leonidou, Boying Li, Oscar Martín Martín, Giacomo Marzi, Emi Moriuchi, Jana Möller-Herm, Karolos Papadas, Christina Papadopoulou, Yasmine Pinzon, Alex Rialp-Criado, Ksenia Rundin, Evangelia Siachou, Kevin So, Max Stallkamp, Bernhard Swoboda, Narongsak Thongpapanl, Zsófia Tóth, Eleni Tsougkou, Aulona Ulquinaku, Ruizhi Yuan and Jeremy Zwiegelaar.

Related articles