Fashion founded on a flaw : The ecological mono‐deterministic fallacy of Hofstede, GLOBE, and followers

Abstract

Purpose

To comment on Brewer and Venaik's review of the misapplication of the national culture dimensions of Hofstede and GLOBE at the individual and other sub‐national levels. This paper supports and extends their critique.

Design/methodology/approach

The implausibility of deterministic claims about the multi‐level power of national culture is described and discussed by drawing on a wide range of disciplines (including anthropology, geography, sociology, and historiography).

Findings

Descriptions of the characteristics and origins of sub‐national level behaviour based on a priori depictions of national culture values are invalid and misleading.

Practical implications

There are important implications for practitioners. The paper highlights the unsoundness of descriptions of the sub‐national (individuals, consumer segments, organizations, and so forth) which are derived from national‐level depictions of culture and the dangers of ignoring the independent causal influence of non‐national culture and non‐cultural factors.

Originality/value

The ecological fallacy in the national culture literature is located within a wider and long‐standing critique of that fallacy. The paper is the first to show that the fallacy in the national culture literature is often an extreme causal version. It not merely supposes cross‐level equivalence, as in the standard version, but more aggressively, it attributes deterministic power to national culture thus excluding other independent influences and agency.

Citation

McSweeney, B. (2013), "Fashion founded on a flaw : The ecological mono‐deterministic fallacy of Hofstede, GLOBE, and followers", International Marketing Review, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 483-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2013-0082