To read this content please select one of the options below:

The Value Scorecard

Stephen Town (University of York, York, UK)

Information and Learning Sciences

ISSN: 2398-5348

Article publication date: 8 January 2018

410

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to describe the Value Scorecard framework for performance measurement and advocacy in academic and research libraries.

Design/methodology/approach

The study used a leadership perspective and an autoethnographic approach to develop and test the theory and practice of value measurement in a case study research library. A constructivist approach was taken for developing the framework, followed by quantitative and qualitative methods to develop, deepen and implement the full description.

Findings

The Scorecard proposition is summarized as previously elaborated in five papers, covering the overall framework and its implementation and more detailed theory and practice from the case library on human and relational capital assessment.

Research limitations/implications

The paper provides a new ontology for research libraries. Implementation has been undertaken in one case library, but the learning should be transferable to others and also potentially to other public sector or values-based organizations.

Practical implications

The Value Scorecard is shown to be applicable to organize measurement and assessment in research libraries for the demonstration and advocacy of a library’s value. It is hospitable to pre-existing data collection approaches.

Social implications

The Scorecard addresses the need to prove the social value and worth of libraries.

Originality/value

The Value Scorecard is a unique and unifying contribution to the frameworks and methods for performance measurement and advocacy in academic and research libraries. The study covers 10 years of research work to understand the concept of value in libraries, as well as 8 years of organizational development to apply this learning.

Keywords

Citation

Town, S. (2018), "The Value Scorecard", Information and Learning Sciences, Vol. 119 No. 1/2, pp. 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-10-2017-0098

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles