Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Implementation of sit-stand desks as a workplace health initiative: stakeholder views

Jennifer Hall (Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University College of Health and Life Sciences, Uxbridge, UK) (Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK)
Tess Kay (Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK)
Alison K. McConnell (Department of Human Sciences and Public Health, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK)
Louise Mansfield (Department of Life Sciences, Brunel University College of Health and Life Sciences, Uxbridge, UK)

International Journal of Workplace Health Management

ISSN: 1753-8351

Publication date: 26 September 2019

Abstract

Purpose

Prolonged workplace sitting can harm employee health. Sit-stand desks are a potential workplace health initiative that might reduce and break up the time office-based employees spend sitting in the workplace. However, little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of providing sit-stand desks. The paper aims to discuss this issue.

Design/methodology/approach

The present study sought stakeholder employee views surrounding sit-stand desk implementation within two UK-based non-profit organisations with open-plan offices. This paper draws on qualitative semi-structured interviews with 26 stakeholder employees and 65 days of participant observations. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and organisational cultural theory framed the study.

Findings

Stakeholders employees’ positioning of sit-stand desks as a workplace health initiative reflected their perceptions of the relationship between sit-stand desk provision, employee health and organisational effectiveness. Perceptions were shaped by the nature and context of the organisation and by occupation-specific processes. Relatively fixed (e.g. organisational structure) and modifiable (e.g. selecting products compatible with the environment) factors were found to restrict and facilitate the perceived feasibility of implementing sit-stand desks.

Practical implications

The findings offer several recommendations for workplaces to improve stakeholder employee attitudes towards sit-stand desk provision and to increase the ease and efficiency of implementation.

Originality/value

Whilst extant literature has tended to examine hypothetical views related to sit-stand desk provision, this study consulted relevant stakeholders following, and regarding, the sit-stand desk implementation process.

Keywords

  • Qualitative
  • Organisational culture
  • Physical activity
  • Acceptability
  • Feasibility
  • Sedentary behaviour

Acknowledgements

The wider research project was supported by funding from Macmillan Cancer Support. Jo Foster and Jenna Stockwell from Macmillan contributed to the design of the study. Sit-stand desks were provided by Ergotron Inc. James Winslade and Carrie Schmitz provided ongoing logistical and ergonomic expertise related to sit-stand desk implementation. The authors would like to acknowledge the support of key personnel, and the provision of study sites, from both participating organisations.

Citation

Hall, J., Kay, T., McConnell, A.K. and Mansfield, L. (2019), "Implementation of sit-stand desks as a workplace health initiative: stakeholder views", International Journal of Workplace Health Management, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-02-2019-0026

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes

You may be able to access teaching notes by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here