To read this content please select one of the options below:

Designing parental leave for fathers – promoting gender equality in working life

Elin Kvande (Institutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskap (ISS), NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)
Berit Brandth (Institutt for sosiologi og statsvitenskap (ISS), NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)

International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy

ISSN: 0144-333X

Article publication date: 11 December 2019

Issue publication date: 24 June 2020

785

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the Norwegian parental leave policy for fathers, the father’s quota, which has reached a mature age of 26 years, asking how gender equality has been affected in working life.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on interviews with 28 fathers who have used the father’s quota, the paper analyzes the connection between leave design, its use and impacts by using the design elements of individualization, generosity and non-transferability.

Findings

Findings show that in granting fathers an individual, earmarked and non-transferable right, the welfare state has contributed to turning leave taking into a norm for modern fathering. The generosity in terms of length and full wage compensation strengthens it as a right in working life. Fathers being paid their full wages for staying at home taking care of their child emphasize the dual-carer norm. The analyses show that the collision between fatherhood and the ideal of the unencumbered employee has weakened in many types of organizations.

Originality/value

The paper addresses the request put forward by Lewis and Stumbitz (2017) and Moss and Deven (2015) where they state that there has been little research addressing how parental leave is implemented in working life.

Keywords

Citation

Kvande, E. and Brandth, B. (2020), "Designing parental leave for fathers – promoting gender equality in working life", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 40 No. 5/6, pp. 465-477. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-05-2019-0098

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles