Models of interethnic relations management in a multicultural society in the context of social consequences of globalization

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this paper is associated with the study of global processes which change the world order and are accompanied with the aggravation of economic competition and geopolitical confrontation, which cause large-scale migration, radicalization of ethnicity and the rise of ethnic separatism. These processes contribute to the aggravation of interethnic antagonisms in multicultural countries and regions; therefore, it is necessary to search for adequate models of interethnic relations management in a multicultural society.

Design/methodology/approach

The methodological foundation of this research consists in activity, civilization, and transformation approaches, which allow understanding the specificity of global processes, the causes of the actualization of ethnic factor in the modern world and the search for new methods of interethnic relations management.

Findings

This paper presents an overview of models of interethnic relations management established in the western countries in the second half of the 20th century. The authors identify specific features of the assimilation and multiculturalism models for managing ethnic differences, their methods of regulation of interethnic relations in a multicultural environment. Their potential in solving the issues of adaptation of migrants and their integration in political and cultural space of the host society in the face of new global challenges and threats is assessed.

Originality/value

The authors of the paper justify the need for a new model of interethnic relations management which is able to forecast the global development trends and adequately respond to negative consequences of global processes.

Citation

Lyausheva, S.A., Shadzhe, A.M., Igosheva, M.A. and Kotlyarova, V.V. (2021), "Models of interethnic relations management in a multicultural society in the context of social consequences of globalization", International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 41 No. 1/2, pp. 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-03-2020-0085