Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Alternative steel lattice structures for wind energy converters

Slobodanka Jovasevic (Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal)
José Correia (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal)
Marko Pavlovic (Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands)
Rita Dantas (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal)
Carlos Rebelo (Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal)
Milan Veljkovic (Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands)
Abilio M.P. de Jesus (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal)

International Journal of Structural Integrity

ISSN: 1757-9864

Publication date: 12 September 2019

Abstract

Purpose

In the last decades, the demand and use of renewable energies have been increasing. The increase in renewable energies, particularly wind energy, leads to the development and innovation of powerful wind energy converters as well as increased production requirements. Hence, a higher supporting structure is required to achieve higher wind speed with less turbulence. To date, the onshore wind towers with tubular connections are the most used. The maximum diameter of this type of tower is limited by transportation logistics. The purpose of this paper is to propose an alternative wind turbine lattice structure based on half-pipe steel connections.

Design/methodology/approach

In this study, a new concept of steel hybrid tower has been proposed. The focus of this work is the development of a lattice structure. Therefore, the geometry of the lattice part of the tower is assessed to decrease the number of joints and bolts. The sections used in the lattice structure are constructed in a polygonal shape. The elements are obtained by cold forming and bolted along the length. The members are connected by gusset plates and preloaded bolts. A numerical investigation of joints is carried out using the finite element (FE) software ABAQUS.

Findings

Based on the proposed study, the six “legs” solution with K braces under 45° angle and height/spread ratio of 4/1 and 5/1 provides the most suitable balance between the weight of the supporting structure, number of bolts in joints and reaction forces in the foundations, when compared with four “legs” solution.

Originality/value

In this investigation, the failure modes of elements and joints of an alternative wind turbine lattice structures, as well as the rotation stiffness of the joints, are determined. The FE results show good agreement with the analytical calculation proposed by EC3-1-8 standard.

Keywords

  • Built-up polygonal sections
  • Preloaded gusset-plate connections
  • Steel hybrid towers
  • Tower geometry

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the European Commission’s Framework Programmes “Horizon 2020” programme through the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Networks (ITN) “AEOLUS4FUTURE – Efficient Harvesting of the Wind Energy” (H2020-MSCA-ITN-2014: Grant Agreement No. 643167) and RFCS – Research Fund for Coal and Steel programme through the Grant Agreement RFSR-CT-2015-00021-SHOWTIME.

Citation

Jovasevic, S., Correia, J., Pavlovic, M., Dantas, R., Rebelo, C., Veljkovic, M. and de Jesus, A.M.P. (2019), "Alternative steel lattice structures for wind energy converters", International Journal of Structural Integrity, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-05-2019-0042

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes

You may be able to access teaching notes by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here