To read this content please select one of the options below:

Work, family and other life domains centrality among managers and workers according to gender

Moshe Sharabi (Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Emek Yezreel, Israel)

International Journal of Social Economics

ISSN: 0306-8293

Article publication date: 9 October 2017

1153

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to examine life domains centrality (work, family, leisure, community and religion) among workers, junior managers and middle managers, both men and women and the impact of demographic factors on those life domains.

Design/methodology/approach

The “Meaning of Work” questionnaire was conducted on 1,201 participants of whom 928, 453 men and 475 women, were employed in organizations in middle managerial, junior managerial and worker positions.

Findings

The findings indicate that work centrality increases while religion centrality decreases with higher organizational status among men and women. The centrality of family is higher among women than among men in the three organizational levels. However, in the new millennium, for the first time in Israel, no traditional gender differences were found in work centrality among employees in the three organizational levels.

Practical implications

Human resource professionals have to take into consideration the increasing work centrality among working women at all organizational levels and focus on decreasing work-family/life conflict, especially among women managers. This can be achieved by implementing flexible hours, working from home, work-life balance programs, and management by objectives systems.

Originality/value

This study, which compares middle managers, junior managers, and workers according to gender, reveals how they balance the five life domains as well as the strategies women managers use to cope with work/non-work conflict.

Keywords

Citation

Sharabi, M. (2017), "Work, family and other life domains centrality among managers and workers according to gender", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 44 No. 10, pp. 1307-1321. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-02-2016-0056

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles