To read this content please select one of the options below:

Verification of the IEC 61508 PFH formula for 2oo3 configuration using Markov chains and Petri nets

Hanane Omeiri (Laboratory of Electromechanical Engineering, Department of Electromechanics, University of Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria)
Brahim Hamaidi (Laboratory of Electromechanical Engineering, Department of Electromechanics, University of Badji Mokhtar, Annaba, Algeria)
Fares Innal (Automation Laboratory of Skikda (LAS), Department of Petrochemistry and Process Engineering, Université du 20 Aout 1955 de Skikda, Skikda, Algeria)
Yiliu Liu (Department of Production and Quality Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)

International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management

ISSN: 0265-671X

Article publication date: 6 July 2020

Issue publication date: 3 February 2021

123

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to check the consistency of the IEC 61508 standard formula related to the average failure frequency (PFH: the probability of dangerous failure per hour) for a commonly used safety instrumented system (SIS) architecture in the process industry: 2-out-of-3 voting (2oo3), also known as Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR).

Design/methodology/approach

IEC 61508 standard provided PFH formulas for different SIS architectures, without explanations, assuming that the SIS puts the equipment under control into a safe state on the detection of dangerous failure. This assumption renders the use of classical reliability approaches such as fault trees and reliability block diagrams impractical for PFH calculation. That said, the consistency verification was performed thanks to a dynamic and flexible reliability approach, namely Markov chains following these steps: (1) developing the multi-phase Markov chains (MPMC) model for 2oo3 configuration, (2) deducing the related classical Markov chains (CMC) model and (3) deriving a new PFH formula for the 2oo3 architecture based on the CMC model and thoroughly comparing it to that given in the IEC 61508. Moreover, 2oo3 architecture has been modeled through Petri nets for numerical comparison purposes. That comparison has been carried out between the numerical results obtained from IEC 61508 formula, the newly derived formula, Markov chains and Petri nets models.

Findings

The newly obtained formula for 2oo3 configuration contains extra terms compared with the IEC 61508 one. Therefore, this latter formula induces an underestimated PFH results, which is dangerous from a safety point of view. This fact was corroborated by the numerical comparison.

Research limitations/implications

This paper does not consider the different configurations given in IEC 61508.

Originality/value

In our knowledge, no verification works have been conducted before on the IEC 61508 PFH formulas with shutdown capability. Therefore, the nonaccuracy of the PFH formula related to the 2oo3 has not been stated before. This paper proposes a new and more accurate formula.

Keywords

Citation

Omeiri, H., Hamaidi, B., Innal, F. and Liu, Y. (2021), "Verification of the IEC 61508 PFH formula for 2oo3 configuration using Markov chains and Petri nets", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 581-601. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2019-0305

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles