The role of the Troika on the Greek central government accounting reforms: The reprioritization riddle

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of the Troika’s advent played in the progress of the budgeting and the financial reporting systems reform at the Greek central government level.

Design/methodology/approach

The approach of an extreme country case study is adopted. The data used in the paper have been identified through document analysis performed on the relevant documents produced by the Troika, the Greek Ministry of Finance, and other relevant sources. The reform process is seen through the lens of the neo-institutional theory and the resource dependency theory.

Findings

Although both reforms targeted the introduction of best international practices – particularly useful in periods of financial distress and scarce resources – the advent of the Troika affected their progress and changed the priorities. As a result, the reform was redirected toward strengthening the cash budgeting system.

Research limitations/implications

The study is subject to the limitations of an extreme case study research.

Practical implications

This is a case where resource dependency changes political priorities and directions and affects the evolvement of state budget and accounting reforms under way.

Originality/value

The role of external fund providers in public sector financial management reform priority-setting, in the case of a developed Eurozone country, is analyzed. The study contributes to the research agenda on accounting practices in times of austerity.

Citation

Cohen, S. and Karatzimas, S. (2018), "The role of the Troika on the Greek central government accounting reforms: The reprioritization riddle", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2016-0101