Assessing the capacity for public value creation within leadership theories: Raising the argument

Abstract

In recent years, public administration has been targeted by multiple reform efforts. In multiple instances, such initiatives have been ideologically couched in public-choice perspectives and entrenched beliefs that government is the problem. One unavoidable consequence of this continued bout of criticism is the fact that government currently has a noticeably decreased capacity of boosting creation of public value. Within this context, there certainly is an important need for approaches that would counterbalance the loss of public value induced by market fundamentalism. This article suggests that leadership, as a concept of theory and practice, due to its partial immunity to the private-public dichotomy, can provide a pragmatic avenue for nurturing public interest and public value within the devolution of governance, a declining trust in government and a diminished governmental capacity to propagate the creation of public value. While this article critically examines and assesses the capacity of different leadership perspectives in terms of creating and maximizing public value, its primary scope is not the provision of definite answers but rather the instigation of a much necessary discussion.

Citation

Roman, A.V. and McWeeney, T. (2017), "Assessing the capacity for public value creation within leadership theories: Raising the argument", International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 479-518. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-20-04-2017-B003