To read this content please select one of the options below:

Coordination mechanisms in four accountable care organizations

Brian Hilligoss (Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University)
Paula H. Song (Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
Ann Scheck McAlearney (Department of Family Medicine)

International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior

ISSN: 1093-4537

Article publication date: 1 March 2016

76

Abstract

New organization theory posits that coordination mechanisms work by generating three integrating conditions: accountability (clarity about task responsibilities), predictability (clarity about which, when, and how tasks will be accomplished), and common understanding (shared perspectives about tasks). We apply this new theory to health care to improve understanding of how accountable care organizations (ACOs) are attempting to reduce the fragmentation that characterizes the US health care system. Drawing on four organizational case studies, we find that ACOs rely on a wide variety of coordination mechanisms that have been designed to leverage existing organizational capabilities, accommodate local contingencies. and, in some instances, interact strategically. We conclude that producing integrating conditions across the care continuum requires suites of interacting coordination mechanisms. Our findings provide a conceptual foundation for future research and improvements.

Citation

Hilligoss, B., Song, P.H. and McAlearney, A.S. (2016), "Coordination mechanisms in four accountable care organizations", International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-19-02-2016-B004

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016 by Pracademics Press

Related articles