To read this content please select one of the options below:

Managing paradoxical tensions during the implementation of lean capabilities for improvement

Malek Maalouf (Department of Business and Management, Aalborg University,Copenhagen, Denmark)
Britta Gammelgaard (Department of Operations Management, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark)

International Journal of Operations & Production Management

ISSN: 0144-3577

Article publication date: 6 June 2016

1919

Abstract

Purpose

Through the identification and investigation of the organisational paradoxes in lean, the purpose of this paper is to deepen the understanding of lean implementation intricacies, and contribute to sustaining lean in companies.

Design/methodology/approach

Case study based on semi-structured interviews with participants in lean conversion from three companies in Denmark. The companies come from different business sectors: public transport, healthcare and finance.

Findings

This study identifies three types of organisational paradoxes in lean: organising, performing and belonging. The study also points to a range managerial responses used for dealing with the three paradoxes and facilitating lean transformation.

Research limitations/implications

This is a theory development paper which increases the understanding regarding the role of the organisational paradoxes in facilitating or hindering lean transformation.

Practical implications

The study generates insights which help managers identify and deal with the individual motivations for opposing lean practices, and thus facilitates lean transformation.

Originality/value

This study adds clarity to the process of managing lean implementation by identifying three different motivations for people to oppose lean transformation. The study also recommends managerial actions for dealing with each situation.

Keywords

Citation

Maalouf, M. and Gammelgaard, B. (2016), "Managing paradoxical tensions during the implementation of lean capabilities for improvement", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 687-709. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2014-0471

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles