TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the adverse incentives at the front end of government-funded projects with concentrated benefits and no liabilities for the privileged groups. In particular, the author discusses the risk of perverse incentives of the types typically found in the development aid sector that results in counterproductive outcomes.Design/methodology/approach The paper uses a simple conceptual framework based on agency theory. A qualitative, case-based approach with purposive sampling was chosen for the empirical part of the study. Eight Norwegian projects were selected because incentive problems were to be expected, and one development aid project served as a reference case.Findings The paper finds that low strategic project success corresponded well with the terms of financing. There were clear indications of agency problems, in three cases to the extent that the incentives turned perverse. The paper concludes with a discussion of relevant measures to prevent the emergence of perverse incentives.Originality/value The paper contributes to an improved understanding of the incentives related to public project initiation and selection, which is an under-researched topic and generally not included in formal project governance schemes. The research should therefore be useful to scholars as well as practitioners within the field of project governance.
VL  - 12
IS  - 2
SN  - 1753-8378
DO  - 10.1108/IJMPB-12-2017-0164
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-12-2017-0164
AU  - Volden Gro Holst
PY  - 2018
Y1  - 2018/01/01
TI  - Public funding, perverse incentives, and counterproductive outcomes
T2  - International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 466
EP  - 486
Y2  - 2024/04/25
ER  -