Environmental collaboration in construction projects: roles of CSR motivations, environmental commitment and team autonomy

Abstract

Purpose

This study identifies three main CSR motivations (i.e. strategic benefits, altruism and greenwashing) and explores the relationship between CSR motivations and environmental collaboration by considering the mediating role of environmental commitment and the moderating role of team autonomy.

Design/methodology/approach

The data collected from 336 respondents in the construction industry, structural equation modeling and bootstrapping were used to test hypotheses.

Findings

The findings show that altruistic CSR enhances environmental collaboration through enhancing environmental commitment, whereas greenwashing CSR damages environmental collaboration through reducing environmental commitment. Although there is no direct association between strategic CSR and environmental collaboration, environmental commitment mediates the effects of strategic CSR on environmental collaboration. Moreover, the positive effect of strategic CSR and altruistic CSR on environment commitment is stronger when team autonomy is stronger, whereas the negative effect of greenwashing CSR on environment commitment is weaker when team autonomy is stronger.

Originality/value

The findings contribute to the understanding of how CSR motivations can act as catalysts for collaborative efforts in addressing environmental issues within construction projects and offer theoretical understanding of team autonomy by illustrating its role in shaping organizational responses to CSR motivations. The findings can provide insights into why and how participating teams can collaborate better on environmental management, enriching the knowledge of environmental management practices in construction projects.

Citation

Fang, S. and Qin, Y. (2024), "Environmental collaboration in construction projects: roles of CSR motivations, environmental commitment and team autonomy", International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 17 No. 6/7, pp. 857-879. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-04-2024-0071