TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to examine diversified mentoring relationships (DMRs) at a mid-sized Midwestern state university (MMSU) in the USA. Design/methodology/approach– The author conducted semi-structured interviews with 14 MMSU faculty members and professional personnel who comprised seven diversified mentoring dyads. The mentees were primarily members of underrepresented minority (URMs) groups, whereas the majority of mentors were members of the dominant culture. Findings– A thematic analysis of the data, grounded in the literature on developmental relationships and relational dialectics theory (RDT), reveals tensions that diversified mentoring dyads experienced, as well as communication strategies that dyad members used to manage these tensions. Research limitations/implications– Although this research is limited by its small sample size and unique geographic location, the findings offer in-depth insight and practical implications for URM faculty members in predominantly white institutions around the globe. Practical implications– The findings of this study have important implications for training supervisors, mentors, and senior colleagues of URM faculty members. Originality/value– This study is unique in that it examines DMRs from a dyadic communication perspective; moreover, it applies RDT to DMRs in organizations.
VL  - 4
IS  - 1
SN  - 2046-6854
DO  - 10.1108/IJMCE-06-2014-0024
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-06-2014-0024
AU  - Meyer Marcy
PY  - 2015
Y1  - 2015/01/01
TI  - Dialectical tensions experienced by diversified mentoring dyads
T2  - International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education
PB  - Emerald Group Publishing Limited
SP  - 21
EP  - 36
Y2  - 2024/09/19
ER  -