Stewardship theory: is board accountability necessary?

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate that notwithstanding the fact that stewardship theory embraces things like trust of directors, their professionalism, loyalty and willingness to be concerned for the interests of others, as well as rejecting the foundations of classic agency problems that are asserted by agency theory, board accountability is as relevant to stewardship theory as it is to agency theory.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper applies the theory underlying board accountability in corporate governance, which is so often applied both in the corporate governance literature and in practice with agency theory in mind, to stewardship theory.

Findings

While the idea of accountability of boards is generally associated with an explanation and conceptualisation of the role and behaviour of directors as agents within classic agency theory, the paper demonstrates that board accountability is a necessary part of board life even if the role of directors is explained and conceptualised in terms of stewardship theory.

Practical implications

The paper suggests some accountability mechanisms that might be employed in a stewardship approach.

Originality/value

While many authors have talked in general terms about board accountability and its importance, this is the first paper that has engaged in a substantial study that links board accountability directly with stewardship theory, and to establish that accountability is necessary.

Citation

Keay, A. (2017), "Stewardship theory: is board accountability necessary?", International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 59 No. 6, pp. 1292-1314. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-11-2016-0118