To read this content please select one of the options below:

Legal syncretism or the theory of unity in diversity as an alternative to legal pluralism in Indonesia

Saldi Isra (Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia)
Hilaire Tegnan (Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, Andalas University, Padang, Indonesia)

International Journal of Law and Management

ISSN: 1754-243X

Article publication date: 9 August 2021

Issue publication date: 11 November 2021

185

Abstract

Purpose

Legal syncretism seeks to provide a rather different account of how laws interact with one another as the people deal with them. The purpose of this study is to provide a rather different account of how laws interact with one another as the people deal with them in the society.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper discusses the current concept of legal pluralism as to whether it really holds as the right theory for building a harmonious and trustworthy legal system in a multi-cultural country such as Indonesia. This study involves socio-legal research drawing on empirical data. It discusses the practice of legal pluralism in Indonesia by analyzing the characteristics of her legal system, especially the roles of customs and religion in it.

Findings

The research, conducted in five Indonesian cities, reveals that the current proposal of legal pluralism is not really helping to solve the difficulties faced by the Indonesian legal system. Therefore, this paper proposes legal syncretism or the theory of unity in diversity (bhineka tunggal ika) as an alternative to help cope with some of the difficulties faced by many legal systems in developing countries, especially Indonesia.

Originality/value

Although legal pluralism sounds promising, wrong and misleading interpretations have been provided by many of its proponents. Legal pluralism has been touted by many socio-legal scholars as a key concept in the analysis of law. Yet, after almost 20 years of such claims, there has been little progress in the development of the concept. Despite these confident pronouncements and the apparent unanimity that underlie them, however, the concept gives rise to complex unresolved problems. Legal syncretism seeks to provide a rather different account of how laws interact with one another as the people deal with them.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to PUSaKO (Center for Constitutional Studies) of the Faculty of Law Andalas University Padang for supporting this research. We thank everyone who supported this study including Prof. Dr.Kurnia Warman, Feri Amsari, Charles Simabura, Dr. Khairul Fahmi and the great team at PUSaKO.

Citation

Isra, S. and Tegnan, H. (2021), "Legal syncretism or the theory of unity in diversity as an alternative to legal pluralism in Indonesia", International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 63 No. 6, pp. 553-568. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-04-2018-0082

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles