TY  - JOUR
AB  - Purpose The recognition of practice in online instruction is still subject to interpretation and different approaches as a result of the rapid changes in technology and its effect on society. The purpose of this paper is to address these differences through a synthesis that can be easily accessed and consulted by educators in the field of e-learning.Design/methodology/approach This paper reviews different examples of rubrics and instruments in higher education to propose a more comprehensive rubric that constitutes a synthesis of how some institutions in HE approach best practice in this field.Findings The proposed comprehensive rubric emanating from the synthesis of different approaches supports the development, remixing, sharing and integration of online modules and courses by providing a single reference point with as wide a range as possible of potential pedagogical tools, facilities and approaches to e-learning.Research limitations/implications It is not within the scope of this paper to review quality assurance processes and administrative components, but to propose a rubric for course design and self-review of faculty and higher education institutions for a better alignment with what is regarded as current standard best practice.Practical implications Instructional designers in e-learning have a new comprehensive rubric that can consult at design stage.Originality/value Different approaches towards what is called “good practice” are brought together and analysed to provide a synthesis and a single source that can be consulted by practitioners in the field of e-learning.
VL  - 35
IS  - 2
SN  - 2056-4880
DO  - 10.1108/IJILT-09-2017-0092
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-09-2017-0092
AU  - Debattista Martin
PY  - 2018
Y1  - 2018/01/01
TI  - A comprehensive rubric for instructional design in e-learning
T2  - The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology
PB  - Emerald Publishing Limited
SP  - 93
EP  - 104
Y2  - 2024/04/24
ER  -