Bedside healthcare rationing dilemmas: a survey from Croatia

Micaela Pinho (Research on Economics, Management and Information Technologies (REMIT), Portucalense University, DEGI, Porto, Portugal) (Research Unit in Governance, Competitiveness and Public Policies (GOVCOPP), University of Aveiro, DEGEIT, Aveiro, Portugal)
Ana Pinto Borges (European Business School and Research Group (NIDISAG), ISAG, Porto, Portugal)
Duje Petricevic (University of Split, Split, Croatia)

International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare

ISSN: 2056-4902

Publication date: 9 July 2018

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to explore Croatian views about issues regarding bedside rationing decisions.

Design/methodology/approach

An online questionnaire was used to collect data from a sample of 243 Croatian citizens. In a context of hypothetical scenarios involving priority setting decisions taking by physicians, the present study elicits Croatian respondents’ views concerning: the ethical principles that should guide patients prioritization; the parties that should make prioritization decisions; and the likelihood of healthcare rationing becoming a reality. Descriptive analysis, factor analysis and parametric and non-parametric tests were performed.

Findings

Findings suggest that Croatian respondents: support multiple substantive rationing criteria, with an incident in favoring the worst-off, reducing inequalities in health, translated in the fair-innings argument and efficiency achievement; appoint health professionals as rationing decision makers; and do not seem to believe in the possibility of patient selection becoming a reality.

Practical implications

Favoring the worst-off, equalizing life time health and the pursuit of efficiency seem to be the criteria most preferred by Croatian respondents to guide rationing policy at the micro level.

Originality/value

This study is the first attempt to elicit Croatian opinions concerning several rationing criteria inherent in healthcare micro allocation decisions. Healthcare rationing is a serious challenge to Croatian policy makers and so it would be useful for the public’s perceptions and beliefs to be considered.

Keywords

Citation

Micaela Pinho, Ana Pinto Borges and Duje Petricevic (2018) "Bedside healthcare rationing dilemmas: a survey from Croatia", International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 153-164

Download as .RIS

DOI

: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-02-2018-0022

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.