To read this content please select one of the options below:

The struggle between welfare state models and prevailing healthcare policy in Scandinavian healthcare legislative documents

Elisabeth Dahlborg (University West, Trollhattan, Sweden)
Ellinor Tengelin (University West, Trollhattan, Sweden)
Elin Aasen (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)
Jeanne Strunck (Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark)
Åse Boman ( University West, Trollhattan, Sweden)
Aase Marie Ottesen (Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark)
Berit Misund Dahl (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)
Lindis Kathrine Helberget (Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway)
Inger Lassen (Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark)

International Journal of Health Governance

ISSN: 2059-4631

Article publication date: 16 November 2020

Issue publication date: 24 February 2021

331

Abstract

Purpose

The paper aims to compare and discuss the findings of discursive constructions of patients in legal texts from the three Scandinavian countries. Since traditional welfare state systems in Scandinavia are being challenged by new governance systems, new questions are being raised about patient positions and agency, carrying with them potential ethical dilemmas for healthcare professionals.

Design/methodology/approach

The methodology of the paper is inspired by critical discourse analysis. Comprehensively analysing the findings of previous discourse studies on how “the patient” is constructed in central policy texts, this study compares the position of the patient in Norway, Sweden and Denmark.

Findings

The paper reveals ideological struggles across the Scandinavian countries, operating at a political level, a legislative level and a healthcare level. It is shown that national governance systems still exert hegemonic power by strongly influencing patients' degree of choice and autonomy. The discursive struggle between welfare state governance and other governance systems in Scandinavia indicates a shift towards a commercial healthcare market although a traditional welfare model is advocated by professionals and researchers.

Research limitations/implications

Because of the specific conditions of Scandinavian healthcare policy, the findings lack generalisability. The research approach should therefore be explored further in additional contexts.

Practical implications

The findings of this study can inform policymakers, professionals and patients of the ideological values underlying seemingly objective shifts in national policy.

Originality/value

A comparative critical discourse analysis can expose patterns in the Scandinavian approaches to patient rights.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Funding for this study was provided by Riksbankens jubileumsfond (grant nr F17- 1120:1). The funding body did not in any way influence the study design, data collection, analysis or manuscript writing and submission.

Citation

Dahlborg, E., Tengelin, E., Aasen, E., Strunck, J., Boman, Å., Ottesen, A.M., Dahl, B.M., Helberget, L.K. and Lassen, I. (2021), "The struggle between welfare state models and prevailing healthcare policy in Scandinavian healthcare legislative documents", International Journal of Health Governance, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHG-04-2020-0041

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles