To read this content please select one of the options below:

Antimicrobial stewardship: Australia

Allan D. Spigelman (Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia)
Shane Rendalls (St Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst , Australia)
Mary-Louise McLaws (School of public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia)
Ashleigh Gray (Synergy Health and Business Collaborative, Sydney, Australia)

International Journal of Health Governance

ISSN: 2059-4631

Article publication date: 5 September 2016

546

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the context for strategies to overcome antimicrobial resistance in Australia, which may provide valuable learnings for other jurisdictions.

Design/methodology/approach

Non-systematic review of literature from websites of national, state and territory health departments and interviews with key stakeholders for Australian strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance.

Findings

In July 2015 all states and territories in Australia adopted the National Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy 2015-2019, which is built on the World Health Organization policy package to combat antimicrobial resistance. This strategy represents “the collective, expert views of stakeholders on how best to combat antimicrobial resistance in Australia. It will also support global and regional efforts, recognising that no single country can manage the threat of antimicrobial resistance alone”. It combines quantitative and qualitative monitoring strategies with frameworks and guidelines to improve management of the use of antimicrobial resistant drugs. Prior to this, health services and states developed and implemented initiatives aimed at monitoring and improving prescribing practices. Development of the national strategy has encouraged and fostered debate within the Australian health system and a raft of new policy initiatives.

Research limitations/implications

Surveillance strategies are in place to monitor impact and trends at jurisdictional and sector levels. However, actual impact on antimicrobial resistance and prescribing practices remains to be seen as existing initiatives are expanded and new initiatives implemented.

Practical implications

This overview of key Australian initiatives balancing quantitative and qualitative surveillance, accreditation, research, education, community awareness and price signals on antibiotic prescribing practices may be valuable to health systems in developing local strategies.

Originality/value

The authors provide an up to date overview of the context, strategies and aims of antimicrobial stewardship in Australia.

Keywords

Citation

Spigelman, A.D., Rendalls, S., McLaws, M.-L. and Gray, A. (2016), "Antimicrobial stewardship: Australia", International Journal of Health Governance, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHG-02-2016-0010

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles