Books and journals Case studies Expert Briefings Open Access
Advanced search

Nurse staffing levels and outcomes – mining the UK national data sets for insight

Alison Leary (School of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK)
Barbara Tomai (Centre for Workforce Intelligence, Mouchel Management Consulting Limited, London, UK)
Adrian Swift (Centre for Workforce Intelligence, Mouchel Management Consulting Limited, London, UK)
Andrew Woodward (Centre for Workforce Intelligence, Mouchel Management Consulting Limited, London, UK)
Keith Hurst (Hurst Research Ltd, Mansfield, UK)

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

ISSN: 0952-6862

Publication date: 18 April 2017

Abstract

Purpose

Despite the generation of mass data by the nursing workforce, determining the impact of the contribution to patient safety remains challenging. Several cross-sectional studies have indicated a relationship between staffing and safety. The purpose of this paper is to uncover possible associations and explore if a deeper understanding of relationships between staffing and other factors such as safety could be revealed within routinely collected national data sets.

Design/methodology/approach

Two longitudinal routinely collected data sets consisting of 30 years of UK nurse staffing data and seven years of National Health Service (NHS) benchmark data such as survey results, safety and other indicators were used. A correlation matrix was built and a linear correlation operation was applied (Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient).

Findings

A number of associations were revealed within both the UK staffing data set and the NHS benchmarking data set. However, the challenges of using these data sets soon became apparent.

Practical implications

Staff time and effort are required to collect these data. The limitations of these data sets include inconsistent data collection and quality. The mode of data collection and the itemset collected should be reviewed to generate a data set with robust clinical application.

Originality/value

This paper revealed that relationships are likely to be complex and non-linear; however, the main contribution of the paper is the identification of the limitations of routinely collected data. Much time and effort is expended in collecting this data; however, its validity, usefulness and method of routine national data collection appear to require re-examination.

Keywords

  • Patient safety
  • Healthcare data
  • Nursing outcomes
  • Staffing
  • Nurse
  • Acute
  • Modelling
  • Safety

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by NHS England. The authors thank Ruth May, Pauline Milne, Vicky Reed, Ruth Auton, Lynne Wigens and Jane Cummings for commissioning the work; however, the conclusions and recommendations expressed in this paper are the authors’ alone.

Citation

Leary, A., Tomai, B., Swift, A., Woodward, A. and Hurst, K. (2017), "Nurse staffing levels and outcomes – mining the UK national data sets for insight", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 235-247. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2016-0118

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2017, Emerald Publishing Limited

Please note you do not have access to teaching notes

You may be able to access teaching notes by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us

To read the full version of this content please select one of the options below

You may be able to access this content by logging in via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
Login
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.
Rent from Deepdyve
If you think you should have access to this content, click the button to contact our support team.
Contact us
Emerald Publishing
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
  • Opens in new window
© 2021 Emerald Publishing Limited

Services

  • Authors Opens in new window
  • Editors Opens in new window
  • Librarians Opens in new window
  • Researchers Opens in new window
  • Reviewers Opens in new window

About

  • About Emerald Opens in new window
  • Working for Emerald Opens in new window
  • Contact us Opens in new window
  • Publication sitemap

Policies and information

  • Privacy notice
  • Site policies
  • Modern Slavery Act Opens in new window
  • Chair of Trustees governance statement Opens in new window
  • COVID-19 policy Opens in new window
Manage cookies

We’re listening — tell us what you think

  • Something didn’t work…

    Report bugs here

  • All feedback is valuable

    Please share your general feedback

  • Member of Emerald Engage?

    You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.
    You can also find out more about Emerald Engage.

Join us on our journey

  • Platform update page

    Visit emeraldpublishing.com/platformupdate to discover the latest news and updates

  • Questions & More Information

    Answers to the most commonly asked questions here