To read this content please select one of the options below:

Quantitative comparisons of urgent care service providers

Hong Qin (Department of Computer Information Systems and Quantitative Methods, University of Texas - Pan American, Edinburg, TX, USA)
Gayle L. Prybutok (Department of Library and Information Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA)
Victor R. Prybutok (Department of Information Technology and Decision Sciences, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA)
Bin Wang (Department of Computer Information Systems and Quantitative Methods, University of Texas - Pan American, Edinburg, TX, USA)

International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance

ISSN: 0952-6862

Article publication date: 13 July 2015

3343

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to develop, validate, and use a survey instrument to measure and compare the perceived quality of three types of US urgent care (UC) service providers: hospital emergency rooms, urgent care centres (UCC), and primary care physician offices.

Design/methodology/approach

This study develops, validates, and uses a survey instrument to measure/compare differences in perceived service quality among three types of UC service providers. Six dimensions measured the components of service quality: tangibles, professionalism, interaction, accessibility, efficiency, and technical quality.

Findings

Primary care physicians’ offices scored higher for service quality and perceived value, followed by UCC. Hospital emergency rooms scored lower in both quality and perceived value. No significant difference was identified between UCC and primary care physicians across all the perspectives, except for interactions.

Research limitations/implications

The homogenous nature of the sample population (college students), and the fact that the respondents were recruited from a single university limits the generalizability of the findings.

Practical implications

The patient’s choice of a health care provider influences not only the continuity of the care that he or she receives, but compliance with a medical regime, and the evolution of the health care landscape.

Social implications

This work contributes to the understanding of how to provide cost effective and efficient UC services.

Originality/value

This study developed and validated a survey instrument to measure/compare six dimensions of service quality for three types of UC service providers. The authors provide valuable data for UC service providers seeking to improve patient perceptions of service quality.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the University of North Texas for the support provided during the conduct of the study and the students at the University of North Texas for their participation.

Citation

Qin, H., Prybutok, G.L., Prybutok, V.R. and Wang, B. (2015), "Quantitative comparisons of urgent care service providers", International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 574-594. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-01-2014-0009

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles