Developing undergraduate social and emotional competencies: a UK/Malaysian comparison

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate similarities and differences between the UK and Malaysian undergraduates in terms of perceived social and emotional competencies (SEC), their effect on academic performance and to make recommendations on curriculum development or teaching and learning interventions to make students more SEC equipped for the “real” world.

Design/methodology/approach

This study employed a positivist approach via a survey instrument to measure the perceived SEC. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including standard multiple regression analyses, were used to test the hypotheses.

Findings

The analysis highlighted specifically, individual competencies (e.g. conscientiousness) rather than competency domains. Striking differences were observed between the two data sets, e.g. the regression analysis revealed that among the UK students, “Self-Awareness” domain and “Service Orientation” competency contributed uniquely to academic performance. However, no significant results were found for the Malaysian students.

Research limitations/implications

Using GPA scores for performance measurement is complex which might have the potential to affect the accuracy of the comparative results.

Practical implications

The findings serve as a practical guide for education providers and employers which they could use to train young and inexperienced undergraduates and provides suggestions for education providers to “build in” specific intra- and interpersonal SEC in their assessment criteria and curriculum activities and modules.

Originality/value

The transnational comparison helps to add a new dimension to support the paucity of the SEC effect on academic performance and suggests which specific individual competencies and which competency cluster to emphasise in two different institutions and countries.

Citation

Carter, S. and Chu-May Yeo, A. (2014), "Developing undergraduate social and emotional competencies: a UK/Malaysian comparison", International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 152-172. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2012-0035