To read this content please select one of the options below:

Hospital disaster resilience: development of an assessment tool using expert panel and fuzzy analytical network process

Saeed Fallah-Aliabadi (Department of Health in Emergencies and Disasters, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran and Department of Health in Emergencies and Disasters, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran)
Abbas Ostadtaghizadeh (Department of Health in Emergencies and Disasters, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran)
Farin Fatemi (Research Center for Health Sciences and Technologies, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran)
Ali Ardalan (Department of Health in Emergencies and Disasters, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran)
Esmaeil Rezaei (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Old Westport Road, Dartmouth, MA, USA)
Mehdi Raadabadi (Trauma Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran)
Ahad Heydari (Department of Health in Emergencies and Disasters, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran)

International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment

ISSN: 1759-5908

Article publication date: 26 July 2021

Issue publication date: 21 September 2022

174

Abstract

Purpose

Resilient hospitals have the vital role in reducing mortality, severity of injuries by providing required emergency services during accidents and disasters. This study aims to identify and prioritize key indicators on hospital resilience.

Design/methodology/approach

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019. The draft of the indicators obtained from the systematic review of the previous study was finalized, with three expert panel sessions and 14 experts in resilience fields. The outputs of these sessions were divided into three domains including constructive resilience, infrastructural resilience and administrative resilience, 17 sub-domains and 71 indicators. Then fuzzy analytic network process method was used to weight and prioritize the final indicators of hospital disaster resilience.

Findings

Administrative resilience, logistic and financial management and strategic outsourcing agreement allocated the highest weight as domain, sub-domains and indicators, respectively. The weight of each sub-domain and indicator was also determined.

Originality/value

Investigating the weight of domains, sub-domains and indicators shows the importance of managerial and operational issues in hospital resilience. By using the indicators and relative weights, a tool for measuring hospital disaster resilience can be created in further studies. The output of these assessments is effective in promoting safety and increasing awareness of hospital managers and health policymakers.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The overall level of hospital disaster resilience obtained using these factors and their weights through factor analysis.

Citation

Fallah-Aliabadi, S., Ostadtaghizadeh, A., Fatemi, F., Ardalan, A., Rezaei, E., Raadabadi, M. and Heydari, A. (2022), "Hospital disaster resilience: development of an assessment tool using expert panel and fuzzy analytical network process", International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 554-567. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2020-0119

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles