To read this content please select one of the options below:

Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models

Maksims Feofilovs (Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes iela 12/1, Riga, LV-1048, Latvia)
Francesco Romagnoli (Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, Riga Technical University, Azenes iela 12/1, Riga, LV-1048, Latvia)
Charlotte Kendra Gotangco (Department of Environmental Science, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines and Ateneo Institute of Sustainability, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines)
Jairus Carmela Josol (Department of Environmental Science, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines and Ateneo Institute of Sustainability, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines)
Jean Meir Perez Jardeleza (Department of Environmental Science, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines and Ateneo Institute of Sustainability, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines)
Joseph Emanuel Litam (Department of Environmental Science, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines)
Joaquin Ignacio Campos (Department of Environmental Science, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines)
Katrina Abenojar (Department of Environmental Science, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City, Philippines)

International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment

ISSN: 1759-5908

Article publication date: 23 April 2020

Issue publication date: 7 October 2020

566

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to present the concepts of two different ways of generating a dynamic structure of the urban system to further allow in understanding specific urban behavior facing against flood and further evaluate the potential effect of specific resilience strategies aiming to decrease the exposure and vulnerability of the system.

Design/methodology/approach

Two system dynamics model structures are presented in form of Casual Loop Diagrams.

Findings

The main differences among the tow approaches are the time horizon and the approach that regulates the assessment of the resilience through a dynamic composite indicator: the first model refers to baseline at initial simulation time; the second model is focused on the ratio service supply to demand.

Research limitations/implications

Within the approach, the purpose is to properly and efficiently evaluate the effect of different Flood Risk Management strategies, i.e. prevention, defence, mitigation, preparation and recovery for consistent and resilient flood governance plans with different type of resilience scenarios.

Originality/value

The need for such tool is underlined by a lack on the assessment of urban resilience to flood as whole, considering the physical and social dimensions and the complex interaction among their main components. There are several assessment tools based on an indicator approach that have been proposed to meet this need. Nevertheless, indicator-based approach has the limitation to exclude the complexity of the system and its systemic interaction in terms of feedbacks’ effects among the identified components or variables selected for the system description. This peculiarity can be provided by System Dynamics modeling.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Capacity Building in Asia for Resilience EducaTion (CABARET) project co-funded by the Erasmus + Programme of the European Union. The European Commission support for the production of this publication does not constitute an endorsement of the contents which reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

This work was also partially aided by grant (#108688) from the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa, Canada, for the project Coastal Cities at Risk in the Philippines: Investing in Climate and Resilience. This project is being implemented by the Ateneo de Manila University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of IDRC or its Board of Governors. The funding source encouraged the submission of the article for publication but had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and writing of the article. Support was also provided by the Ateneo Institute of Sustainability (AIS) and the University Research Council (URC).

Citation

Feofilovs, M., Romagnoli, F., Gotangco, C.K., Josol, J.C., Jardeleza, J.M.P., Litam, J.E., Campos, J.I. and Abenojar, K. (2020), "Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models", International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, Vol. 11 No. 5, pp. 615-629. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-02-2020-0013

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles