To read this content please select one of the options below:

A comparative study of knitted strain sensors fabricated with conductive composite and coated yarns

Rafiu King Raji (Engineering Research Center of Knitting Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China)
Xuhong Miao (Engineering Research Center of Knitting Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China)
Shu Zhang (Engineering Research Center of Knitting Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China)
Yutian Li (Engineering Research Center of Knitting Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China)
Ailan Wan (Engineering Research Center of Knitting Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China) (Key Laboratory of Advanced Textile Materials and Manufacturing Technology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China) (Key Laboratory of Textile Fiber and Product, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, China)
Charles Frimpong (Department of Industrial Art, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana)

International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology

ISSN: 0955-6222

Article publication date: 6 March 2019

Issue publication date: 3 April 2019

386

Abstract

Purpose

The use of conductive yarns or wires to design and construct fabric-based strain sensors is a research area that is gaining much attention in recent years. This is based on a profound theory that conductive yarns will have a variation in resistance if subjected to tension. What is not clear is to which types of conductive yarns are most suited to delivering the right sensitivity. The purpose of this paper is to look at strain sensors knitted with conductive composite and coated yarns which include core spun, blended, coated and commingled yarns. The conductive components are stainless steel and silver coating respectively with polyester as the nonconductive part. Using Stoll CMS 530 flat knitting machine, five samples each were knitted with the mentioned yarn categories using 1×1 rib structure. Sensitivity tests were carried out on the samples. Piezoresistive response of the samples reveals that yarns with heterogeneous external structures showed both an increase and a decrease in resistance, whereas those with homogenous structures responded linearly to stress. Stainless steel based yarns also had higher piezoresistive range compared to the silver-coated ones. However, comparing all the knitted samples, silver-coated yarn (SCY) proved to be more suitable for strain sensor as its response to tension was unidirectional with an appreciable range of change in resistance.

Design/methodology/approach

Conductive composite yarns, namely, core spun yarn (CSY1), core spun yarn (CSY2), silver-coated blended yarn (SCBY), staple fiber blended yarn (SFBY) and commingled yarn (CMY) were sourced based on specifications and used to knit strain sensor samples. Electro-mechanical properties were investigated by stretching on a fabric tensile machine to ascertain their suitability for a textile strain sensor.

Findings

In order to generate usable signal for a strain sensor for a conductive yarn, it must have persistent and consistent conductive links, both externally and internally. In the case of composite yarns such as SFBY, SCBY and CMY where there were no consistent alignment and inter-yarn contact, resistance change fluctuated. Among all six different types of yarns used, SCY presented the most suitable result as its response to tension was unidirectional with an appreciable range of change in resistance.

Originality/value

This is an original research carried out by the authors who studied the electro-mechanical properties of some composite conductive yarns that have not been studied before in textile strain sensor research. Detailed research methods, results and interpretation of the results have thus been presented.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Citation

Raji, R.K., Miao, X., Zhang, S., Li, Y., Wan, A. and Frimpong, C. (2019), "A comparative study of knitted strain sensors fabricated with conductive composite and coated yarns", International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 181-194. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCST-07-2018-0087

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles