To read this content please select one of the options below:

Roles of scholars in environmental community conflict resolution: A case study in contemporary China

Lihua Yang (School of Public Administration and Workshop for Environmental Governance and Sustainability Science, Beihang University, Beijing, China)
G. Zhiyong Lan (School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China and School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA)
Shuang He (Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK)

International Journal of Conflict Management

ISSN: 1044-4068

Article publication date: 13 July 2015

1000

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate scholars’ roles in resolving environmental community conflict, as environmental community conflict is becoming an increasingly serious problem in contemporary China, and it explored the underlying factors and mechanisms that influence successful conflict resolution.

Design/methodology/approach

Based on a combination of three types of sources – interviews, participant observation and existing literature, the study compared and contrasted 35 cases through a two-stage study project with 25 environmental community conflict cases in the first stage and ten non-environmental cases in the second.

Findings

Results indicate that scholars serve seven roles in community conflict resolution: identification persons for potential sources of community conflict and supporters for the people who evaluate conflict problems before attempting to solve them; advisers for conflict protagonists; leaders of many knowledge-related activities; organizers of entrepreneurial activities for other community members; information brokers between community members and other stakeholders; representatives of the government, firms, community members and other stakeholders; and self-interested participants. While scholars’ participation is important for resolving community conflict, their actions are often not effective. Successful community conflict resolution involving scholars must satisfy eight underlying factors: local scholars’ sustained participation; high capacity; improvement on the organizational level of community members; emphasis on high efficiency knowledge and information transmission; effective finding and use of the community’s social capital; continual optimization on their action strategies; obtainability of some benefits; and non-local scholars’ sustained external support through social capital. The more closely these rules are followed, the more successful scholars’ participation in community conflict resolution will be.

Originality/value

The findings have practical implications for improving the effectiveness of scholars’ participation in community conflict resolution in contemporary China and even in other countries.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Key Project of National Social Science Fund of China (14ZDB143), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71073008) and the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry, China (60300002011111001). The authors would like to thank the late Professor Elinor Ostrom, Professor John Hall, Professor David Guston, Mr Louis Standish and Mr Zhenggang Wang for their helpful suggestions and constructive criticisms. Special thanks go to the anonymous reviewers and the editor whose suggestions and comments have significantly improved the article.

Citation

Yang, L., Lan, G.Z. and He, S. (2015), "Roles of scholars in environmental community conflict resolution: A case study in contemporary China", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 316-341. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-05-2012-0019

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles