To read this content please select one of the options below:

Climate justice: between Mammon and Mother Earth

Mandy Meikle (School of Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK)
Jake Wilson (School of Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK)
Tahseen Jafry (School of Engineering and Built Environment, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK)

International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management

ISSN: 1756-8692

Article publication date: 15 August 2016

660

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to contribute to the ethical debate over roles and responsibilities to address the injustices of climate change and its impacts. The current impasse over taking action may lie in the very different ways people view the world and their place in it. The aim is to explore some profound contradictions within differing strands of knowledge feeding into common understandings of climate justice.

Design/methodology/approach

A literature review of appropriate peer-reviewed and “grey” literature was conducted with a view to defining the term “climate justice”.

Findings

In addition to there being no single, clear definition of climate justice, a fundamental schism was found between what indigenous peoples want to see happen and what industrialised nations can do with respect to both the mitigation of, and adaptation to, climate change.

Research limitations/implications

One limitation to defining climate justice, and reason for publishing, is the lack of peer-reviewed work on this topic.

Practical implications

This paper has many practical implications, the most fundamental of which is the need to reach a consensus over rights to the Earth’s resources. If humanity, within which there are many societies, chooses to follow a truly equitable path post 2015, industrialised countries and corporations will need to move away from “endless growth economics”. The ways in which climate justice might be operationalised in future are considered, including the concept of a “climate-justice” checklist.

Originality/value

While the reconciliation proposed in this paper might be considered idealistic, unless it is acknowledged the Earth’s resources are limited, over-exploited and for all people to use sustainably, thus requiring a reduction in consumption by individuals relatively affluent in global terms, climate negotiators will continue talking about the same issues without achieving meaningful change.

Keywords

Citation

Meikle, M., Wilson, J. and Jafry, T. (2016), "Climate justice: between Mammon and Mother Earth", International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 488-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-06-2015-0089

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2016, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles