To read this content please select one of the options below:

Comparison of mitigation potential estimates of three models using the IPCC 3-tier approach

Indu K. Murthy (Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India)
Rakesh Tiwari (Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India)
G.T. Hegde (Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India)
M. Beerappa (Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India)
Kameswar Rao (Department of Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, India, and)
N.H. Ravindranath (Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India)

International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management

ISSN: 1756-8692

Article publication date: 12 August 2014

149

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to estimate carbon mitigation impacts of project activities in a community forestry project in Andhra Pradesh, India. Measurement and quantification of carbon stocks, monitoring of these stocks over time and projections using models is necessary for assessing the climate change mitigation potential or impacts of all forest development and conservation projects.

Design/methodology/approach

In this study, multiple mitigation assessment methods and models were used to estimate the carbon mitigation impacts – PROCOMAP, TARAM and CATIE, by adopting a three-tier approach similar to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines.

Findings

There are differences in mitigation potential estimates across models as well as across tiers. The study highlights the strength and weaknesses and/or limitations and advantages of adopting the different approaches and their applicability for estimating mitigation potential of a forestry project. The same could be adopted for a future Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) regime also, given countries may not have the necessary technical capacity and data needed during the post-2012 REDD scheme. While countries with advanced data, technical and research capabilities could use models or, in other words, adopt the Tier-3 approach, countries with data and technical limitations, as in India, could adopt a Tier-2 or Tier-1 approach to begin with.

Research limitations/implications

The limitations and advantages of use of the multiple mitigation models is addressed.

Originality/value

This work would help understand use of three mitigation models by prospective students and researchers and also the data needs and limitations for use of these models.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the World Bank for funding this project. They profusely thank the AP Forest Dept, in particular Mr Ramesh Kalghatgi (The PCCF), his colleagues in Hyderabad and, more importantly, his colleagues and field staff at the Forest Division and Range level. They also thank the staff of Vanasamakhya and CPF for assistance in field work. This work was carried out at the Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.

Citation

K. Murthy, I., Tiwari, R., Hegde, G.T., Beerappa, M., Rao, K. and Ravindranath, N.H. (2014), "Comparison of mitigation potential estimates of three models using the IPCC 3-tier approach", International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-06-2012-0032

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles