To read this content please select one of the options below:

Quantity surveyor's ethical responsiveness on construction projects: issues and solutions

Andrew Ebekozien (Department of Construction Management and Quantity Surveying, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa)
Clinton Aigbavboa (Construction Management and Quantity Surveying, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa)
Angeline Ngozika Chibuike Nwaole (Department of Quantity Surveying, Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Owerri, Nigeria)
Emmanuel Okhatie Dako (Department of Quantity Surveying, Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Owerri, Nigeria)
Andrew Igiebor Awo-Osagie (Department of Quantity Surveying, Delta State University of Science and Technology, Ozoro, Nigeria)

International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation

ISSN: 2398-4708

Article publication date: 27 September 2021

Issue publication date: 24 November 2023

677

Abstract

Purpose

Studies showed that construction consultants' ethical negligence is a contributing factor to the time and cost over-run of projects. There is limited research on the issues that may have hindered construction consultants' ethical responsiveness during contract administration. Studies regarding influencing factors in the context of Nigeria's quantity surveyors' (QS) ethical responsiveness are rare. Thus, the study aims to investigate the perceived issues and proffers initiatives to promote QSs' ethical responsiveness on construction projects in Nigeria.

Design/methodology/approach

To determine the perceptions of QS regarding ethical responsiveness, a phenomenologically driven perspective via face-to-face interviews was conducted with 12 senior professionals in Lagos and Abuja that showed interest in participating in the study and were interviewed. A thematic approach was adopted to analyse the collated data.

Findings

Economic, societal and professional issues emerged as the three groups of issues that hindered QS's ethical responsiveness on construction projects in a developing country setting such as Nigeria. Findings show that for ethical responsiveness to be expressed on projects, key stakeholders should be ethically responsible. This is currently missing, especially in public construction projects. Initiatives that can promote key stakeholders' ethical responsiveness on construction projects are examined in this paper.

Practical implications

The paper embraces an important practical implication because practices associated with QS's unethical responsiveness and behavioural impacts on construction projects were identified. This will stir both the regulatory professional bodies and policymakers to enforce and implement feasible initiatives that can promote key stakeholders' collaborative ethical responsiveness on construction projects.

Originality/value

This paper is amongst the few papers that attempted to uncover issues that hinder QS's ethical responsiveness on construction projects in a developing country setting via a qualitative approach. Since these issues are rampant in developing countries, findings from this paper can be used to promote QS's ethical responsiveness in other nations with similar unethical issues.

Keywords

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the participants for providing knowledgeable contributions to enhance the findings of this paper. Also, the authors appreciate the comments, suggestions, and recommendations provided by the anonymous reviewers, which collectively helped hone and strengthen the quality of this manuscript during the blind peer-review process.Funding: Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment and CIDB Centre of Excellence (05-35-061890), University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

Citation

Ebekozien, A., Aigbavboa, C., Nwaole, A.N.C., Dako, E.O. and Awo-Osagie, A.I. (2023), "Quantity surveyor's ethical responsiveness on construction projects: issues and solutions", International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 1049-1066. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-04-2021-0061

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles