Linking satisfaction to share of deposits: an application of the Wallet Allocation Rule

Lerzan Aksoy (School of Business, Fordham University, Bronx, New York, USA)

International Journal of Bank Marketing

ISSN: 0265-2323

Publication date: 28 January 2014

Abstract

Purpose

Despite the fact that customer satisfaction is among the most widely used metrics by managers, the link with share of deposits tends to be weak. Using a recent innovative approach termed the “Wallet Allocation Rule (WAR)” this research investigates whether measuring satisfaction relative to other competitors used exhibits a stronger correlation to share of deposits compared to measuring absolute satisfaction with the focal firm/product.

Design/methodology/approach

A survey approach was used with a sample of 4,712 banking customers across the USA. Using the WAR, each respondent's satisfaction ratings were transformed into relative rankings and used to estimate their share of deposits.

Findings

The results confirmed that at both the individual and the aggregate level examining relative ranked satisfaction correlates strongly with customers’ share of deposits. At the individual level relative satisfaction explains 55 percent of the variance in share of deposits, as opposed to only 9 percent for absolute satisfaction.

Practical implications

The findings indicate that managers need to rethink their current approach to satisfaction measurement and consider measuring their customers’ satisfaction relative to competitors used. Furthermore, using aggregate level absolute satisfaction in managerial decision making can be misleading.

Originality/value

This research provides a significant contribution to both the banking literature and the scientific literature in general by examining the robustness of a relative metrics approach within the retail banking and credit union market.

Keywords

Citation

Aksoy, L. (2014), "Linking satisfaction to share of deposits: an application of the Wallet Allocation Rule", International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-03-2013-0025

Download as .RIS

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2014, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Please note you might not have access to this content

You may be able to access this content by login via Shibboleth, Open Athens or with your Emerald account.
If you would like to contact us about accessing this content, click the button and fill out the form.
To rent this content from Deepdyve, please click the button.