Misclassifying cash flows from operations: intentional or not?

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the accuracy and informational quality of the cash from operations section of the cash flow statement.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper empirically tested the accuracy of the cash from operations reported by Canadian non-financial companies. The authors studied 262 companies at three different time periods providing 786 firm observations. For each observation, the balance sheet was used to confirm the figures reported in the statement of cash flows. In addition, the authors investigated management's disclosure of the particular working capital items.

Findings

The findings suggest that in recent years, companies are more likely to overstate their cash flow from operations, thereby presenting a better financial picture than is supported by the balance sheet accounts. This would suggest that the investing or financing section would be correspondingly understated. The presence of acquisitions reduces overstatements, which may be the result of more auditor presence.

Research limitations/implications

This paper extends previous research from documented single, isolated instances of cash from operations being misstated to include a significant sample with more generalizable findings. The data are Canadian which may limit the generalizability to other countries. Future research should address the extent to which financial analysts rely on the reported cash from operations figure.

Practical implications

This preliminary study may have implications for financial analysts and others relying on the free cash flow figure.

Originality/value

This study expands on previous research which has taken place only on a case-by-case basis.

Citation

Lightstone, K., Wilcox, K. and Beaubien, L. (2014), "Misclassifying cash flows from operations: intentional or not?", International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-07-2012-0039